The Essentiality of Employment and the Importance of Trade and Industry
Endeavour and work are the base and foundation upon which the world of creation is established and these are the only guarantee for the survival of every creature. The Almighty Allah has equipped His creatures with suitable means with which they derive benefits and avoid losses.
Man, who is the most astonishing and sophisticated design of creation, has more requirements than any other creature. Thus he needs more endeavors with which he could meet his countless requirements and also maintain the family that he should naturally administer.
That is why Islam, which is a natural and social religion, considers working and earning as wajib for the people.
The Holy Prophet (S) states: "It is wajib upon every Muslim man and woman to earn halal money for his or her livelihood and subsistence [7] ."
Islam has not attached any importance to those who spend their lives idly. Whenever the Holy Prophet (S) saw a man whose strength and capability were surprising, he would ask: "Does he work?" If they said: "No, he is idle.", the Holy Prophet (S) would state: "To me, he has no respect.", meaning that an idle youth had no value to the Prophet (S) [8].
In Islam, every individual should choose one of the many professions and industries towards which the Almighty Allah has guided him to choose according to his own aptitude and interest. He should earn his living in this way, carry one of the burdens of society on his back, and try to provide the people with comfort.
The Almighty Allah states: "And that man shall have nothing but what he strives for (53:39)."
In short, Islam has made the strongest recommendations about working and acquiring sustenance and has not disregarded the importance of economic activities even in the most critical moments so much so that Al-\'Imam al-Sadiq (A) said to his friend Hisham: "Even during the war, when soldiers array in line and when the fire of battle is fanned, do not neglect your economic duty and necessary activities for providing your subsistence and follow your financial efforts in such difficult situations [9] .
Thus idleness due to laziness is strictly forbidden in Islam.
Denouncement of Idleness
It is clear from what has been discussed earlier that working and making effort is a right path that creation has provided for man to attain his prosperity by following it. Surely, deviation from the path of creation and nature, no matter how minor it is, will only lead to the detriment of man. In this case, deviation from a matter upon which the very foundation of life is established will lead to nothing but misery in this world and in the Akhirah.
This is why the seventh infallible Imam Musa al-Kazim (as) states: "Do not show sluggishness and tiredness in your work or else you will lose in this world and in the Akhirah."
The Holy Prophet (S) has cursed those who have got used to idleness and who put the burden of their life on the shoulders of others.
Today, psychological and social experiments have thoroughly clarified that most social corruptions are generated by idleness. It is idleness that disrupts the economic and cultural activities of the society and gives rise to all kinds of moral decadence and superstitions.
Agriculture and Its Advantages
Farming, which is the means for providing food for the society, is one of the most praiseworthy human professions due to its importance. Therefore, Islam has laid down great emphasis for choosing this profession.
The sixth infallible Imam Ja\'far al-Sadiq (as) states: "Farmers would enjoy more respectable positions than others on the Day of Qiyamah."
The fifth infallible Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (as) states: "There is no job better than farming and there is no benefit better than the benefit of farming, because benevolent and malevolent grazing animals and birds benefit from it and pray for the farmer."
The Holy Prophet (S) states: "A Muslim who plants a tree or cultivates a land from which people, birds, and grazing animals eat will have the reward of sadaqah (charity)."
Muslims are obliged to use their natural energy to the maximum, i.e., to the point where one of the religious leaders states: "If at the time when the world is to come to an end and the solar system is to collapse any one of you has a small plant in hand, he should plant it if he has enough time to do so [10] . This means that the idea of the collapse of the world should not prevent you from performing this noble deed.
\'Ali (as) states: "Curse and imprecation of Allah be upon one who has land and water, i.e., one who has natural resources at his disposal but does not use his human skill to take advantage of them and consequently lives in poverty and beggary [11] ."
Self-Confidence
It has been repeatedly mentioned under the section on "Beliefs" that the general planning of Islam is that man should worship none except Allah and should not pay homage and bow down to anyone but He Who is the Creator of the world.
All are the creatures of Allah and receive their subsistence from Him. No one has privileges over others except in respect of those things which are done for the sake of Allah.
Every Muslim should have self-confidence and should take advantage of the blessing of independence given to him by the Almighty Allah. Man must use all the means that Allah has bestowed on him to pass his life. He should not rely upon others and consider a partner for Allah and worship a new idol each day.
The servant should realize that he eats his own bread and not of the master. He should know that he receives the reward of his labor, not the tip from his master or lord. Every employee should believe that he receives the wages of his hard work, not the gift and gratuity from his boss, his office, the government, or the society.
After all, a free man should not rely on and pay homage to any but Allah; otherwise, internally, he will have the same meanness and servitude of polytheism that the idol-worshippers have openly.
Finally, it should be noted that self-confidence means that man should use his intrinsic capability in his life and should not rely on others. It doesn\'t mean that he should dissociate from the Almighty Allah and consider himself to be really effective as the source of all hopes and desires.
The Disadvantages of Relying On Others
Relying on others, that is, living on the support of others, means giving up human pride, honor, independence, and freedom. It is the source of all kinds of offences and social misdeeds which originate from meanness and degradation.
Whoever relies on others and fixes his eyes upon this or that person, indeed offers his will and commonsense for sale, for he should commit flattery and should do whatever (right or wrong, decent or indecent) they demand of him or order him to do.
He should resign himself to any disdain and scorn. He must practice xenophilism, agree to do any injustice and oppression, and at last consider all the limits and human laws as naught.
Asking for help in unnecessary cases is haram in Islam. Financial contribution to the needy, which is a part of Islamic provisions, only applies to those needy people whose earning is less than their expenses or to those who are disabled.
Imam reza network
The Role of Central Banks in Islamic Banking
"...ideologies…affect the topics discussed, the manner of discussion, the factors included or left out or inadequately stressed in arguments, comments, and models and attitudes shown, sympathetic or hostile,…to past and contemporary economists\' works and views. "
Based upon above statement it can be argued that there are a lot of differences between Islamic and conventional banking systems both at micro and macro levels. These differences are in approach, in concepts, and in the resulting behaviour.
My presentation is based upon the following primary and secondary assertions, which are the result of 27 papers and 3 books. The last book: "Comparative Money and Banking in Capitalistic and Islamic Systems", in 856 pages, has been recognized in February 2002 in Iran as "The Economic Book of The Year". These assertions and the final conclusion may seem rather unorthodox, but they are the product of their own logical reasoning. The essence of my paper is thus nothing but one of the logical consequences, among others, of the following assertions everybody is able to derive.
Primary assertions are those, which can directly be used to reach the final conclusion of this paper. Secondary assertions are key issues to be used, one way or another, to lead one to the problems in implementing Islamic Banking. These two types of assertions, however, constitute separable sets.
Based upon the fact that the primary function of banks is to deal with "money", one cannot speak about " banking" without referring to money. Hence, it seems a "must" to understand money first. Otherwise many Miss-interpretations may arise as the result.
Interest and profit, although being clear concepts, have been subjected to many misunderstandings. To be sure, let me make them clear at the outset. Interest and profit are rewards to money and capital investment, respectively. In other words, capital investment produces profits and money produces interest. Furthermore, it has constantly and mistakenly written and quoted by some writers that the price of money is 1 (unity). One is the exchange rate of money with itself; but the price of money is interest (rate).
Some of my findings about the nature and role of profits closely correspond to those of Prof. Adrian Wood in his seminal book " A Theory of Profits ". With the abolishment of interest (as it has in Islamic school of economic thought), the LM curve loses its total validity and becomes redundant and useless.
All in all, interest is a normative concept (basically discussed in schools of economic thoughts), which can neither be proved nor refuted by use of scientific tools of analysis. It is a value judgement. In evaluating an economic system, economists are supposed to take it for granted.
Assertions:
1. In economics we are basically dealing with two inter-related concepts; one is legal (or conventional) concept and the other is real concept. To distinguish one from another, one does not need to focus on the physical features of each one. All contractual agreements like marriage, ownership, organizational hierarchy, money, interest, and the like fall into the first category; while human beings, commodities, buildings, amenity, and the like are included in the second category. Each one of these two concepts is able to produce the other or be transformed into itself. Let us call these two properties " Completeness" and " Reflexivity", respectively. Hence, money itself being a legal concept is capable to producing another legal concept (actually its derivative) called "interest" or to produce real concept like capital equipment.
2. Money as a potential capital is a legal (conventional) concept capable of being transformed into actual capital. A simple example would be Mudarabah contract, among others, in which as soon as one person\'s money is legally combined with another person\'s labour force, the nature and the function of money is changed into capital. Given that in an Islamic framework there is no reward to money lending (i.e. interest being zero) yet capital (i.e. money\'s transformed version) is eligible for part of the profit earned.
3. Various modes of contract available to Islamic banks are the major source of transforming money deposits of individuals and firms into capital (or asset). Any type of financing under any modes of contract by these banks will essentially increase the value of the asset of the economy. However, some modes of contract like Musharakah and instalment sales (originated by firms) increase the productive capacity of the economy. Any positive change in the firm\'s asset values (rather than their capital values which is by itself a vague concept responsible for some obscurities) can be called " investment". Following this practice it is easy to calculate, rather than to estimate, the amount of investment, which has taken place in an economy during one specific year with relatively high precision. This can be done by reading the asset values off the current balance sheets, firms submit to tax authorities. By putting asset values, instead of capital, into the production function, not only it becomes more precise, but also meaningful. Firms\' rate of profit is, hence, logically defined as the ratio of profit to their assets. Since the value of firms\' assets is normally greater than their value of capital, therefore, the rate of profit defined as the ratio of profit to the value of capital, underestimates the true rate of profit.
4. Based upon J. M. Keynes\' criticism on the classical economists inability to recognize speculative demand for money in the presence of interest (rate), it can easily be shown that interest is both necessary and sufficient condition for speculation. In other words, there is a two-way relationship between interest and speculation. It is probably for this reason that he has also recognized commodities rates of interest in addition to money rate of interest that he was much concerned about. That is, whenever a commodity is speculated upon a specific rate of interest would emerge. With the abolishment of interest, speculative motive of the demand for money, logically derived from interest, would disappear. Speculation, which necessarily entails artificial risk in any market, be it in money, bond, gold, commodities and the like, is not permissible in an Islamic setting. All of these can safely be taken under the heading of "gambling".
A corollary to the above assertion is that with the disappearance of bond market stocks are expected to be exchanged in an Islamic stock market based upon their book values. In terms of Tobin\'s Q this quotient is supposed to be close to unity (one). It is because in a world with perfect markets, economic value (EV) and replacement cost (RC), will coincide. This brings the quotient to unity. An implication of this is that in a world with perfect markets valuing the firm would be easy; i.e. we could read the economic value of the firm off the current balance sheet. Risk is essentially interwoven with investment. It can be considered "natural" and hence permissible in Islam. However, impermissibility of artificial risk may be grounded upon the fact that any income received by speculator will eventually bring about excess demand for goods and services (without the speculator having any share in productive activities). This excess demand, in turn, becomes the main source of inflation.
Let me conclude discussing about this assertion by citing two statements correctly made by Prof. Gardner Ackley:
a) "Speculation - if mistaken - tends ultimately to be self -correcting in any commodity market. "
b) " ...the real cause of unemployment is speculative demand for money".
5. The natural consequence of elimination of interest, as said earlier, is the elimination of money market. Hence, the major motive to use money is for transaction purposes, which underlies the structure of ordinary demand and supply schedules for goods and services. Furthermore, based upon the logical statement that "the speculative motive is derived from money\'s use as an asset, as a store of value", money can no longer possess the "store of value function" in an Islamic framework.
In the absence of interest, money market and speculation, and all monetary policy tools used in conventional banking, would lose their validity in Islamic banking. Let us call the policy followed in this new setting "Financial Policy". The unique and powerful tool of financial policy is to determine the share of profit relative to that of capital for all investment projects submitted to Islamic banks. This is probably the most important role a central bank can play in an Islamic banking. There are many factors underlying the determination of this share, especially in the face of natural risk.
This share if effectively used would make bank\'s sources of finance properly channelled into asset building processes without worrying about money whirlpool to emerge. To determine equilibrium in this market the relative profit rate of the Islamic bank (call it financier) to that of the investor (call it the financee) can be constructed. This rate is especially useful in cases where different risks are involved. To prepare a list of different risks involved in various investment projects is another important task of a central bank.
6. Western economists have always and justifiably been worried about unnecessary expansion of money supply the volume of which is hard to control by central banks. This is due to the fact that considerable portion of it (very difficult to determine if not impossible due to uncertainties involved in interest rates) goes to money whirlpool. This is probably the reason Prof. Milton Friedman in his paper addressing the problem of stabilization policy has advocated the Required Reserve Ratio (RRR) to be raised to one hundred percent. It is clear that such a banking, if possible, would lose its own entity and merely becomes safe-deposit office. If Islamic banks are prohibited to lend on interest nonetheless different modes of contract, as mentioned earlier, are available to them to finance specific needs of both firms and individuals upon their proper requests. If constant and effective supervision is conducted on a random basis by the central bank the chances are very slim a money market, which could be outlawed, to be developed. So the kernel of Islamic banking is Profit and Loss Sharing (PLS). By preparing accurate information and making them available to the general public, central bank in Islamic banking system would be able to provide symmetric information and prevent moral hazard, to a great extent.
7. Money\'s inability to be a tradable entity and its production and volume being closely watched by the central bank (which is apart of the public sector), seems appropriate to be classified as "Impure Public Good" in an Islamic state. For the sake of brevity some properties of (impure) public goods which also applies to money, in this setting, will be outlined as follows:
a) Non-existence of money market.
b) Elimination of speculation.
c) Demand for it can be constructed by vertical summation of individual demands.
d) Externality of money can be derived from its capability of becoming actual capital; hence, government\'s (i.e. central bank\'s) intervention. Furthermore, it benefits each person simultaneously and is thus equally available to each person. Simultaneous benefit is not a "must" for a "thing" to be public. A good example is highway. Highways do not generate simultaneous benefit to all individuals; they are equally available to all individuals. Non-exclusion principle also applies here. Additional individuals looking for money may be added at zero marginal cost.
e) Indivisibility of money refers to its purchasing power and not its physical character.
f) Its velocity is greater than unity implying that one is not supposed to "capture" it as opposed to the case of private good whose velocity is unity implying that it can be "captured".
A caveat is in order here. Money has two distinct attributes; one at micro and the other at a macro level. At the micro level, it is part of the asset of an individual possessing it. But at macro level it cannot be added to the assets of the economy. To count money as wealth (or asset) of a nation will lead one to commit both fallacy of composition and double counting problem. This property of money may be the only one that makes it distinct from other "public goods". This could probably be the consequence of money being the medium of exchange.
8. Removal of interest and all its derivatives (i.e. lending on interest, money market and speculation) from an economy will lead Islamic banks to finance investment projects through PLS. The criteria to be used by such banks are both profitability and feasibility of the projects. Hence, projects compete with each other on the bases of their Internal Rates of Return (IRR). However, the criterion used by a potential investor is IRR of a specific project. The role of the central bank in determining arrays of IRRs for different sectors and various activities is highly valuable in channelling resources into proper projects.
Ranking IRRs in descending order, an investor would first choose the project with the highest IRR. However, the rule, which seems appropriate in choosing the amount to be invested, is "cut-off rate". The maximum amount one investor is willing to invest in a project is determined by the IRR of the next project whose value is almost equivalent to the chosen project, without it being "the opportunity cost" of capital.
Cut-off rate, seems to me, has long been mistakenly interpreted as opportunity cost. In investment decision making most of the times we are ~ dealing with the cut-off rate concept (even in an interest based economic system) but very rarely with opportunity cost. In capitalistic system, rate of interest is justifiably used as the opportunity cost of capital. It is well justified that interest rate is essentially determined independently from the rate of return in the real sector of the economy. However in the absence of interest, projects compete with each other to obtain finance from Islamic bank on the basis of their IRR because there is no other alternative. Comparison among various IRRs brings about the role of cut-off rate without anyone of them becoming opportunity cost of another project. Cut-off rate functions as a signal to show an investor up to what point he should invest and where to stop and select another project. Interdependencies among various investment projects produce cut-off rate the special character and function of which differ from those of interest rate.
The reason, seems to the author, that we often fail to distinguish between these two concepts is the interdependence condition. Furthermore, choosing one, IRR of one project as the opportunity cost of another project in the same activity (on the basis of the principle of next best alternative) will lead one to a whole range of so-called opportunity cost list, none of which have possibly the same value. Hence, different cost calculations in the same activity. Whereas cut-off rates could be numerous for many producers in the same activity without making them run into any problem.
In the absence of interest rate there is nothing to compare IRR of an investment project with. Therefore, we can conclude that in an Islamic economy opportunity cost of capital is zero. The foregoing statements were justified on the basis of economic logic; accountants do not seem to have any reason to believe otherwise. One final remark can be added to above statements. Opportunity cost of capital can also be used as the cut-off rate but the reverse is not true.
After their feasibility and profitability have been confirmed by Islamic bank\'s qualified personnel, projects become eligible to obtain finance; furthermore, the projects themselves become collateral for finance. Central bank\'s role in providing guidelines about both of these two aspects will certainly be appreciated by Islamic banks.
As long as there are unemployed factors of production suitable to be utilized in investment, projects have to be financed by Islamic banks no matter how much money is required to finance them. This gives appropriate apparatus to materialize the assertion made by S. M. Bagher Sadr when he says; "Tools of production are treated servants in Islam and man the master". It is the right of labour, in Islam, not to be kept unemployed.
In the final analysis, every piece of bank note coming out of an Islamic bank in response to financing an investment project can be called Certificate of Asset Building (C.A.B.). These C.A.B.\'s are appropriate both to production and household sectors.
9. In dealing with various modes of contract, Islamic banks finance profitable and appropriate projects. Appropriateness of projects are expected to be determined by the central bank; however, to determine which projects are more profitable to finance is the task of each individual Islamic bank. Central bank\'s task is to instruct Islamic banks to give priority to those projects, which are more compatible with the country\'s economic plan (be it either explicit and written or unwritten and implicit).
Islamic modes of contract can be classified into two broad categories:
1. Those with variable return and (2) with fixed return. Musharakah and Mudarabah contracts fall into the first classification and Instalment Sales, Hire-Purchase, Joalah, and the like into the second one. Musharakah (i.e., PLS) has well and rightly been recognized as the core of Islamic banking. In Mudarabah contract labour has no responsibility as to any loss that may occur provided that it had done its best. The second class of contracts may be defined as auxiliary contracts, which could be used in conjunction with and after the first category has been utilized. Risk is involved with the first type but the second is risk less which is more appealing to Islamic banks. To reduce or even to eliminate the burden of risk from the shoulders of investors it requires another paper, which IS beyond the scope of this presentation.
However, to make sure that the guideline controlling the complementarity of the second type contracts has properly been observed, the Islamic central bank is supposed to keep close eye on the contracts signed by each individual Islamic bank. I skip going into the mechanism of how the burden of risk can be lessened or even eliminated; to determine the degree of risk in different sectors and regions throughout the country. This is another crucial task of an Islamic central bank. This will facilitate the task of Islamic banks in determining the relative share of their own profit vis-à-vis that of the investor. This task not only is beyond the capabilities of an individual Islamic bank, but also provides a uniform procedure for all Islamic banks for various sectors, locating in different regions of the country.
10. Whether an Islamic bank uses the variable or fixed- rate-of-return contract, accountants are very keen about costs that are supposed to be deducted from, total revenue. Accountants who are responsible to approve and submit both balance sheets and profit and loss statements to tax authorities do not accept anything under the heading of cost from neither of the two types of contracts provided that they have been financed by Islamic banks. It is a fact that economists use these two valuable documents for economic analysis and their own interpretations without being able to adjust them on the basis of their own interpretation of cost. Nevertheless, neither of the two professions (accounting and economics) can deny that the Islamic banks\' share of profit paid by investors (i.e. financees) is in fact sort of dividend which is essentially determined after all costs have been subtracted from revenue and hence can no longer be considered cost.
To sum up the role of a central bank in an Islamic state, we come up with six different crucial functions to be performed at different levels of rigorousness:
a) Active participation in the process of preparing economic development plan.
b) Informing individual Islamic banks about the priorities of investment projects as outlined in the country\'s economic development plan at different regions and various sectors.
c) Calculating and submitting to Islamic banks the profit shares of banks relative to those of capital for different projects at various regions and sectors.
d) Calculating and submitting to Islamic banks the value of risk involved in different projects, different regions, and various sectors of the country.
e) Constant inspection and supervision to make sure that projects have properly been financed relative to the priorities and the value of risks.
Note: To do all above functions effectively an Islamic central bank is supposed to be well equipped with highly qualified personnel in portfolio and risk management and project appraisal. This is also a must for each individual Islamic bank.
f) After making sure that Islamic banks have concisely followed the central bank\'s instructions they can safely be allowed to gradually reduce RRR down to zero.
Let me admit that monitoring cost in Islamic banking compared to the conventional banking is relatively high. However, potential benefits as to its effects on reducing unemployment and keeping prices constant over-shadow the cost. Most important, distribution of income and wealth is expected to be more equitable than otherwise. Such a scheme of distribution guarantees sustained economic development. The role of an Islamic central bank in a uniform distribution of information and prevention of moral hazard cannot be overstated.
Whether it is the Islamic banking or the realization of Keynes\' expectation to reach full employment, it is yet to be seen. In closing my presentation, I would like to cite what Keynes has to say about this whole issue: "If I am right in supposing it to be comparatively easy to make capital goods so abundant that the marginal efficiency of capital is zero, this may be the most sensible way of gradually getting rid of many of the objectionable features of capitalism."
Nonetheless it seems that these two models, in the final analysis, converge. He, in this respect, admits that "...it is to our best advantage to reduce the rate of interest to that point relatively to the schedule of the marginal efficiency of the capital at which there is full employment."
Imam reza network
Islamic Economy: Its Ideological and Legal Foundations
Every system, intending to achieve certain goals, must be designed in a realistic manner. Therefore, if the system is supposed to be implemented in order to serve human life, particularly in the long-run, it must serve man\'s goals and be consistent with his fitrah (primordial nature). This is not possible unless the designer of the system has a command over the knowledge necessary for understanding social and individual aspects of man. Besides, the designer should have a thorough understanding of actual relations between those two aspects of man and the primordial nature of man as well. In addition to those prerequisites, the designer should understand the historical trends of such a relationship, the needs for the development of such relationships and methods for pursuing those needs in order to realize an evolutionary, human approach toward actualizing the goals of the creation of man.
Indeed, the way the aforesaid satisfaction of needs is to be carried out should not overlap other systems which are meant for satisfying other needs of man. In other words, such a system should observe a wise balance and study the role and interrelationship of other systems which together comprise the whole system of life.
If we assume that the designer of the system possesses all those necessary prerequisites, we should assess subsequent stages in the process of achieving the desirable realism which is necessary for a system to be able to provide a proper context for itself. By this we mean the extent to which this system is compatible with the norms and values of the society (where the system is to be implemented), the extent of consistence between those norms and values and the emotional values presented by the system, and finally the extent to which this system assures the realization of a desirable education to create social obedience for those ideological views and emotional values.
Although the system may be realistic, accurate, and rational in perceiving the reality and understanding its needs and their satisfaction, it will remain incapable if it is not preceded by an ideological impetus which supplies the society with bases for the stance that it should take toward the universe, the life, and the man itself. Consequently, the ideological impetus will guarantee the system the element of ?m?n [faith] rescue it from the most important civilizational maladies including ilh?d [atheism], which is the opposite of ?m?n, and shirk [polytheism], which signifies the excessive belief in false gods, and shakk [doubt], which is a manner resembling other destructive attitudes. Unless these requirements are realized, we cannot assure the provision of the first contextual element for the system\'s implementation. Similarly, as long as the emotional motivations, which are the focus of education, are not perfectly compatible and harmonious with the ideological structure of the society, we cannot guarantee balance in man\'s personality when there is a wide gap between his beliefs and the internal and external values and motivations that the system provides in order to satisfy his needs. Moreover, these emotional motivations cannot form human behavior and action unless they are strong and clearly defined.
So far, we have realized the necessity of two factors for every system intending to materialize its human goals: first, the planner\'s holistic approach towards human reality, including his relations and needs as well as their fulfillment concomitant with the rest of the system; second, facilitating its implementation through faith and compatible emotional motivations.
Realism, in turn, requires the following two fundamental factors: first, the system should contain legal guarantees binding all those who oppose the harmonious human nature or those few who have not chosen the complete ?m?n or the full commitment to the requirements of ?m?n; second, it has a perfect flexibility to accommodate the temporal and spatial variations in human life and provides fixed solutions for fixed elements of human life and flexible ones for the accommodation of its alterable elements.
We believe that Islam was correct in announcing its rule in the form of general rules. Thus, it did not ignore any one of those aspects, but observed them perfectly and completed the religion which provides appropriate answers to man\'s needs till the Day of Judgment.
Accordingly, it announces that the whole Islamic system is based on reality and nature and that it is the fixed truth aiming at serving human beings and accomplishing the purpose of his creation. Thus, it enjoins whatever is desirable and forbids whatever is refused by the nature.
God, the Exalted, says: "Then set your face upright for religion in the right state, the nature made by Allah in which He has made men. There is no alteration in Allah\'s creation. That is the right religion but most people do not know." (30:30)
And He, the Exalted, says: "Say: O people! Indeed there has come to you the truth from your Lord ..." (10:108)
And He, the Exalted, says: "O you who believe! Answer (the call of) Allah and the Apostle when he calls you to that which gives you life, and know that Allah intervenes between man and his heart, and that to Him you shall be gathered." (8:24)
And He, the Exalted, says: "Those who follow the Apostle Prophet, who was taught neither to read nor to write, whom they find written down with them in the Tawr?h and the Inj?l [Old and New Testaments], (who) enjoins them to do good and forbids them from doing evil, and makes the pure and good things hal?l [lawful] for them and makes impure and harmful things har?m [prohibited] for them, and remove from them their burden and the shackles which were upon them. So (as for) those who believe in him and support him and help him and follow the light which was sent down with him, they are indeed the saved." (7:157)
The proof of this argument is the same one that proves its attribution to the Great Creator as it proves for this Creator all attributes of knowledge about all facts and full, absolute control over the formation of shar?`ah (the comprehensive body of Islamic rules), and perfect kindness to the servants and other attributes which are not imaginable for any body other than Him the Exalted.
We are not to present any reasoning for this but only point to the Holy Qur\'?n\'s emphasis on this fact in all occasions when it points to Allah\'s kindness and knowledge:
"Does He not know Who He created? He it is Who made the earth smooth for you, therefore go about in the spacious sides thereof, and eat of His sustenance, and to Him is the return after death." (67:14-15)
"Say: Allah suffices as a witness between me and you. Surely He is Aware of His servants, Seeing. And whomsoever Allah guides, is the follower of the right way, and whomsoever He causes to err, you shall not find for him guardians besides Him. And We will gather them together on the day of resurrection on their faces, blind and dumb and deaf. Their abode is hell, whenever it becomes allayed We will add to their burning." (17:96-97)
After this introduction, we try to discuss several points pertaining to the core of the discussion with emphasis on the following subjects:
1. Major attributes of the Islamic economy, their natural character, and
Islam\'s emphasis on them.
2. The proper grounds Islam prepares for its economic system.
3. Relationship between this system and other systems.
4. Flexibility of the Islamic economic system.
Salient Features of the Islamic Economy
When we study the Islamic economy as a way which Islam prescribes for individual and social behavior in the economic field and examine Islam\'s rules in this area, we can conclude that its most important attribute is social justice. In this respect, the Islamic economy resembles all other systems that claim to be serving human being and realizing his social aspirations but it differs from them in the details of its conception of social justice.
Justice cannot emerge unless the following requirements are present: first, believing in the private and social property on an equal and advanced level in a way that the private property acts on the fulfillment of man\'s natural demands for possessing the result of his effort and obtaining the benefits of his business. While the public property aims at guaranteeing that social action enjoys a social product through which the provision of some needs and shortages would become possible.
Second, faith in individual economic freedom as a general, continuous, comprehensive principle which stems from the nature of the ownership along with the belief in the existence of some limits at which this freedom ends. This is for the purpose of either guaranteeing individual\'s interest as in the case of objects the use of which was outlawed because of the physical or moral damage that they could inflict upon the individual, or to secure others\' rights and liberties which is also a natural guarantee admitted by all religions and human affiliations.
Third, faith in the principle of mutual responsibility. Islam guarantees, for every individual in the Islamic society, the subsistence level, i.e., provision of his natural needs. The government is obliged to provide this minimum for all and it is absolutely impermissible that even a single needy person is found in the Islamic society. Regarding how to make the society economically capable of doing this, the following factors may be mentioned:
Obliging individuals to accomplish their responsibilities and duties with respect to the provision of the necessary needs of others. Since one of government\'s responsibilities is to compel individuals to perform their obligations, even those which are individual, it may bind individuals to carry out these duties as well.
The legal power of wal?y al-amr [head of the Islamic government] to determine the limits of public domain through legislation supplies the government with the desirable power.
Public properties and anf?l [properties with no particular owner/s] which are designated by the government as public properties which the government oversees and uses to achieve the above goal.
Financial punishments and methods that are devised by Islam to transfer private properties to the public ownership as with respect to mawq?f?t [endowments] or the lands the inhabitants of which perished or the dead without heirs and so forth.
Nature of the Islamic legislation--as Shah?d al-Sadr (r) put it--which aims at strengthening the social structure for the realization of this mutual responsibility.
Fourth, belief in the principle of social balance and refusal of the class system in the Islamic society. We came to know through the third point that the required minimum is to provide subsistence for all individuals. As far as the maximum is concerned, it may be assumed through the following factors:
1. The prohibition of tabdh?r and isr?f [wasting and squandering] in all areas, therefore, an individual cannot possibly trespass to the line of isr?f.
2. The prohibition of every action that leads to misuse of particular properties, and of lahw [amusement] and muj?n [impudence].
3. Rejection of all social and economic privileges which discriminate between different groups of people which, in turn, eliminates all the grounds for the emergence of the class system.
If we go back and scrutinize all of these features and expose them to human nature and conscience we will find them principles that may be admitted in a natural way. This explains the return of each of the two extremist systems of capitalism and socialism to a moderate position after its collision with opposing natural factors--as we believe.
The natural basis of these views is evidently emphasized by general regulatory and conceptual authoritative texts (nus?s) that are numerous and to some of which we point here:
There are nus?s that stress the inherence character of private and public property:
The Exalted says: "And the man shall gain nothing but what he strives for." (53:39) (naturally if we interpret it as including worldly possession).
Am?r al-mu\'min?n (`a) says: "This property is indeed neither mine nor yours but it is a collective property of the Muslims ... what is earned by their hands does not belong to any mouths other than theirs." (Nahj al-Bal?ghah, sermon 232)
There are some nus?s that emphasize the economic freedom in a natural form the clearest of which is the rule on which all fuqah?\' [Islamic scholars] rely, namely the rule [people are in control of their properties]). Naturally, there are some limits to this freedom which are mentioned by other nus?s stressing that this restriction is only for the benefit of the individual and the society.
There are some nus?s that emphasize the inherence of mutual responsibility and cooperation and further consider all kinds of negligence with respect to this principle as a general rejection of d?n [faith and religion]. The Exalted says: "Have you seen the person who rejects the religion? He is the one who treats the orphan with harshness, and does not urge (others) to feed the poor." (107:1-3)
Finally, there are some nus?s that stress the necessity for the realization of balance in the society through their emphasis on the prohibition of isr?f and also the necessity of renouncing poverty and providing subsistence for every individual. The Im?m (`a) says, while speaking of the duties of the wal?y al-amr [leader] toward the needy: "He keeps giving him from zak?h till he makes him needless."
The Proper Grounds Which Islam Prepares for Its Economic System
In this regard, the analyst can find in front of him a huge wealth of noble nus?s that emphasize various concepts and numerous rules and fixed historical laws and that all serve the cause of Islamic economy and participate, in a natural way, in the realization of its far-reaching goals. We mention below a number of these issues:
A. The Real ownership belongs to Allah, the Exalted:
This principle is the most important tenet that forms man\'s image as it leaves its visible marks on the economic behavior of Muslim individual. Ownership belongs only to the Unpaired, Almighty Allah and He the Exalted bestowed an assumed, legal ownership upon the human being so that it distributes the properties among its individuals and exercises this ownership according to the purposes that Allah chose for the benefit of humanity. This notion has great influence on the exclusion of negative effects on ownership in its absolute capitalistic form.
B. The purpose is to reclaim the land through a joint, human effort and responsibility:
In this way, the man believes that the human effort from the beginning to the end is one and that the important goal is to make the humanity subservient before God, establish the worshipping society and prepare the grounds for it through making the earth inhabitable, extract the greatest benefits from it to the advantage of all through performing the duties arising from the joint responsibility. Diversion from this is diversion from the purpose.
C. Ethical concepts in the service of economic cause:
Islamic nus?s are full of a magnificent ethical plan which leads to its contribution to this economic system and to the realization of its goals. Most of the riw?y?t [traditions], on one hand, encourage in the human being the spirit of cooperation, responsibility, Islamic fraternity, ith?r [self-sacrifice], zuhd [piety], and compassion for the miseries and aspirations of others. On the other hand, they drive away from the human being such vices as stinginess, greed, exclusivism, transgressing the rights of others, opportunism, avarice, and envy. Im?m S?diq (`a) counted all good manners as the troopers of `aql [wisdom] and all vicious attributes as the troopers of jahl [ignorance]. We can neither mention all of the riw?y?t in this regard nor touch on their educational details, therefore, only point to this particular fact that the Islamic ethics and educational system augment in human being the spirit of generosity before they emphasize the economic freedom and the possibility of using it to his own particular benefits. The story of Q?r?n [Korah] is well-known for its focus on this ethical principle (And seek by means of what Allah has given to you the otherworld\'s abode and do not neglect your share of this world ... (28:77)).
This story and this principle is a multifaceted Islamic creed which, if prevails in the society, will provide the greatest grounds for the implementation of the desirable economic system.
D. Al-inf?q al-mustahabb [commendable spending for a divine cause] and the extended life:
Here, a wonderful aspect of the solution to the problem of conflict between the inherent motivations for serving one\'s self and the motivations for serving the society is manifested. According to this notion, one begins with the prolongation of his own life and ends up with a level of eternity in the hereafter. He finds out that self-interest and social interest are integrated; a notion that encourages him to make continuous inf?q which does not ever run out of its driving forces according to the principle which says "whoever establishes a favorable habit he will be rewarded both for it and for the action of whoever follows it." And here we would like to remind emphatically the extended effect of waqf since, as the result of these motivations, the private property is transferred to the public ownership and man\'s permanent exploitation of his property is realized.
E. Shukr al-ni`mah [gratitude for a blessing] means to make the best use of the wealth and avoiding its waste:
The major problem in the global economic domain does not lie in the weakness of growth rates of natural resources and their failure to keep up with the population growth rate but it lies in the failure to make ideal use of natural resources or, as the nus?s put it, in kufr?n al-ni`mah [ingratitude for the blessing] and squandering the natural, mineral and animal resources and so forth (And He gave you of whatever you asked Him for and if you count Allah\'s blessings you will not (possibly) obtain their number. Man is indeed very unjust, very ungrateful. ... (14:34))
And it is a kind of shukr al-ni`mah to make ideal use of he labor force and to avoid wasting it. For this reason, the nus?s emphasize the continuous work and even declare it obligatory for those who are able.
F. Relationship between moralities and material pursuits at the civilizational level:
There is an amazing civilizational fact that nobody can perceive it except those who believe in the ghayb [the metaphysical world] and its various aspects. The Holy Qur`?n stresses that ~ulm [injustice] leads to hal?k [annihilation] (Thus, because of their injustice We destroyed them) and that \'adl [justice] and du`?\' [praying] and shukr [gratitude] leads, in a lawful way, to rakh?\' [comfort] (Ask for your Lord\'s forgiveness, surely He is the most Forgiving. He will send down the cloud upon you pouring down abundance of rain. And help you with properties and sons, and make for you gardens and make for you rivers. (71:10-12). This fact arouses, in hearts, a great hope in the future, even the material future, and opens the way for a social and economic dynamism.
Add to what was mentioned above other major factors that contributes to this background.
Strong Connection with Other Systems
It is evident in all systems devised by Islam that they are put forward as parts of a larger system which includes, in general, the whole universe. These systems are in strong and close interconnection in such a manner that none of them can achieve its desired goal without the implementation of other systems (and naturally, we do not claim here that the obligation to set up the system hinges on the establishment of other systems but what we emphasize is the issue of system\'s achievement of all of its desired goals.)
In this regard the following points should be made:
A. Certain areas of the social system are reserved to be filled by the wal?y al-amr (or by some one appointed by him) due to his ijtihad [ability to extract Islamic rule whenever needed] and determination of the nature of the prevailing situations and ummah\'s interest. This is what we observe, for example, in economic, legal, and penal systems and in the institutions of waqf [endowment], mu`?mal?t [transactions], irth [inheritance], and so forth. This fact indicates the complete connection between these institutions and the ruling political system.
B. The economic system is strongly related to the system of `ib?d?t [worshippings]. This is the issue which is sometimes presented as the companionship of the prayers and zak?h in tens of Qur\'anic cases. Zakah and khums are two financial `ib?dahs. Financial kaff?r?t [expiations] are, in fact, also a huge economic participation by `ib?d?t system in the service of public economic interest. It should not be ignored that some `ib?dahs like sawm [fasting] and hajj provide the elements of economic grounds, to which we clearly pointed. There are certain `ib?dahs that strongly contribute to the public ownership such as waqf, if we require n?yyat al-qurbah [proximity intention] in it.
C. The economic system and its goals and pecularities naturally have a strong connection with the system of mu`?mal?t [transactions] which is designed in such a manner to provide the proper environment for the realization of mutual responsibility, balance, and dual ownership, emphasize the labor element, and prohibits rib? [usury], [financial misappropriation], harmful acts, lahw [debauchery], and wasting of the wealth.
D. There is a considerable linkage between the economic system and the system of jih?d [military defense] in Islam for the latter system involves, in addition to combative rules and methods, implications for ownership, war spoils, and so forth.
E. Undoubtedly, the economic system is also related to the social system including the form of society\'s principle cell, i.e. the family, and also the social relations among the families, and individual\'s relations with the society. All of these are predominated by social Islamic rules including mutual responsibility and balance, which form the most important characteristics in the economy as we mentioned frequently. This argument also involves the rules regarding mahrs [dowries], nafaqahs [allowances], various methods of division of labor, and such issues as irth [inheritance], was?iyyahs [bequests], and the rulings with regard to children, qa_?\' [adjudication], financial ta`z?rs [discretionary punishments] and other varieties of financial punishments, and others which may not be all discussed in this limited space.
G. Touching on these relations, the late ?yatull?h al-Sadr points to another aspect of the issue, namely the relationship between government\'s economic doctrine and its financial policy which is, in fact, a part of government\'s planning for enforcement of the laws of Islamic economy, thus, it is a part of the economy itself.
H. We already pointed to the link between Islam\'s economic system and its ethical system which makes the latter one of the major preludes and the motivating element for the ummah in the way of implementing the economic system and realizing its goals to such an extent that it becomes hard to distinguish between the two systems.
Here I would like to point, as a diversion from the main course of discussion, to the fact that Islam addresses the whole life in general and devises for it the best system which guides toward the goal in a deliberate manner and based on principles of justice and equity. Whereas we find the positivist world today floundering in the establishment of a desirable system for the protection of human dignity, distribution of responsibilities, and realization of rights. Therefore, social systems collapse, one after another, and admit their defeat while Islam remains a straight religion without any deviation.
As an example for this argument, we focus on the slogan which the positivist world spouts through giving it a widespread global character and which has recently altered to a sweeping emotional wave, namely the slogan of equality of women and men in all situations, periods, and places, and with respect to all rights without any exceptions whatever it would be. We have been finding this slogan tens of times in the documents presented in the conferences of Mexico City, Bucharest, Cairo, and recently in a strong and explicit form, in the Beijing Conference on Woman. We see the document produced by this conference concentrating, specifically, on the issues of inheritance, absolute material equality, judgeship, and the so called sexual freedom rights for all ages and so forth.
We consider this slogan as a blind assertion although it has an attractive appearance since equality is one of the principles favorable to the human taste concerning two individuals whose rights are equal in terms of their human dignity and affiliation, i.e. the man and the woman. But this principle is not too general to have exceptions. This is due to the natural differences between man\'s and woman\'s physical and emotional structures, nature of the social responsibility which is to be carried out by each, and the extent of participation by each in the social construction including the establishment of social justice. Hence, we may not call out the slogan of quantitative equality without considering the desired balance otherwise we will commit, through this equality, injustice and unfairness. When the principles of equality and social justice are in conflict, one may ask to which one the priority goes? Undoubtedly, the principle of justice is the one which common-sense testifies to its generality and insusceptibility to exception, therefore, social justice qualifies the principle of equality and even determines its socially desired form.
We feel great regret on the blind, sweeping, global wave that has been put forward thoughtlessly and that criticizes against the Islamic inheritance system pretending to ignore that it is part of a whole and that there is a wonderful balance between this system and the nafaqah [allowance] system and the duties of each of the man and the woman in the social life.
The Flexibility of Islamic Economic System
This subject is, in general, related to the flexible character of Islamic rules but we will show it from the economic angle. Briefly, Islam supplied this system with all necessary elements which enable it to accommodate the vital changes which occur frequently and rapidly in the economic field. The reason is that economy is a field related to the complexities of man\'s social life as well as to nature\'s ability to provide, and the proper environmental conditions, and so on. Therefore, with respect to land distribution and ownership, there is a great difference between the situation of land\'s perfect abundance and man\'s insufficient physical power and the situation of scarcity and increasing shortage resulted from human growth rates on one hand, and man\'s immense technological power to reclaim the land. This difference may affect the issues of occupancy -which is considered as an ownership factor-, social development, mines\' ownership, vertical ownership -both in depth and in altitude-, energy\'s ownership, etc.
This difference may also influence the issue of alteration of the nature and effects of property relationship leading mujtahids [jurists] to keep aloof from the issue of absolute ownership of land and suggest the subject of exclusivity right which results from the impact made by the individual on the land, thus when the impact ceases to exist the right will expire and returns to the public domain which can be used by the Islamic state according to the public interest.
Therefore, existence of the element of ijtihad and its constant openness represents one of flexibility elements without which one cannot know the developments\' effects on the nature of the rule deduced form the nus?s.
The fact that Islam put forward certain broad economic rules and related them to the `urf [prevailing standards of conduct] concept has a special connotation for notions like isr?f and tabdh?r [wasting and squandering], faqr and ghin? [poverty and needlessness], al-nafaq?t al-muta`?rifah [customary allowance], al-manfa`at al-muhallalah [lawful profit], ma`?n [basic need], rib? [usury], mithl?yyah and q?m?yyah [fungibility and being ad valorem], circulation and depression of cash currencies, _am?n [liability], individual and social damage, haraj [impediment], _ar?rah [urgency], al-maslahat al-`uly? [the higher expediency], being asbaq [preceding] in waqf, being `aqd?y [contractual], being bay`?y [exchange], trade through tar?_i [mutual agreement], being qimar?y [gamble], lahw, and even `ad?lah [justice], ~ulm [injustice], ta`add? [transgression], and misappropriation of property. Thus, `urf intervenes when these concepts change, often due to change in conditions, and consequently, as a result of change in the `urf? [commonplace] view of the subject the judgment also changes as we saw in the issue of shatranj [chess] for example.
However, the most important element on which the Islamic system concentrates is the element of intervention by the mujtahid, just wal?y al-amr in the economic life. This intervention has its own criteria, rules, and what the late al-Sadr calls the penetrating beams that illuminate Islam\'s positions and give it the spirit of the system and its promising goals1. In such a system, the wal?y has the obligation to take advantage of his social power and true commitment to Islam and the Islamic expediency of the ummah and, through consultation with the masters of knowledge and expertise, carry out his duties which can be summarized as the following:
1. Identification of the best methods and executive arrangements for the enforcement of the fixed rules of Allah, e.g. looking for the best way to eliminate rib? in the society while preserving the positive activities performed by the banks.
2. Filling the public domain with laws in accordance with the supreme Islamic expediency while preserving, as much as possible, the primary rule regarding the various cases.
3. Determining the extent to which the conditions are favorable for the enforcement of Islamic rules and institutions. Therefore, if the faqih finds the conditions and the rules in such a serious incompatibility that is called by the scholars of us?l as taz?hum [conflict], namely taz?hum between the wuj?b [obligatoriness] of implementing the hukm [ruling] and the prohibition of resulting evil consequences, he must produce the best possible solution to facilitate the implementation of the hukm while compensating its mafsadahs [damaging results]. If this appears to be impossible he should shift to the area of tarj?h bi al-ahamm?yah [preference based on priority] which is a vast area that follows the opinions of experts and mujtahids. The situation may reach to a point that due to the priority of preventing the mafsadah caused by it, the implementation of a certain hukm is suspended. This area is an accurate and a delicate one which is not to be resorted to except in rare situations.
Conclusions
Based on what was discussed above we can briefly highlight the following practical conclusions:
First, we repeatedly see or hear those who suggest the idea of cross-combination of ideology and system which signifies the establishment of a socialist or a capitalist economic system in an Islamic environment or the implementation of Islamic institutions in secular social structures. When these combinationists do not achieve desirable results from their efforts they tend to ignore the contradiction between the system and its implementation context and place the blame on the system itself. We may mention two experiences as examples here:
1) the experience of establishing socialist systems in our Islamic world and their quick failure as in Algeria -- during Houari Boumedienne\'s presidency -- and Libya.
2) the experiment of setting up al-qar_ al-hasan [interest-free loan] funds under secular systems where it was struck with unsatisfactory results that encouraged the opponents to attack the resulting situation as cacophony and accusing the planners of neglecting the absence of favorable conditions.
Second, If we wish to achieve good results in our Islamic community, we must provide the desirable grounds through deepening the faith in Allah and disseminating the elevated Islamic ethics, explicate the Islamic concepts related to economics and convey them to the public, and strive to mobilize the feelings and sensations and give them a desirable Islamic shape. As long as we do not accomplish this task we should not expect ideal results. In this regard, I would like to draw your attention to some advertising tactics employed by the banks which concentrate on the profits generated by the money deposited in al-qar_ al-hasan funds and on prizes that it may bring for the depositors without ever referring to the great reward which ensues whenever they participate in the revitalization of the public economy and server the society through their bank activities and deposits and without mentioning the noble ayat and ah?dith which call for such deeds.
Third, we propose that Islamic banks form a fiqh? committee consisting of prominent scholars, and further, that the mujtahids in al-hawz?t al-`ilm?yyah (Islamic theological schools) undertake a study about the legitimacy and plausibility of the proposed economic, financial, and banking systems from the viewpoint of Islamic laws and constantly express their opinions concerning new forms for such systems.
Bay` al-salam [forward sale], and bay` al-salam al-mum?thil [fungible forward sale],manufactured sale, tawr?d [mutual forward] contracts, murabahah [resale with stated profit] contracts, and so on are examples of economic institutions that provide banks with more alternatives for economic activities. This is what the late Shah?d al-Sadr proposed a quarter of a century ago through his famous proposal known as rib?-free banking and what I put forward as the draft law for the prohibition of rib? in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Ijtih?d is indeed a source of blessing and Islamic rules are overflowing reserves that can undoubtedly help us to safeguard the Islamic character and spirit and overcome the difficulties caused by the developments of modern life.
Notes:
1. These goals include, for example, Qur\'?n\'s emphasis on avoidance from creating a situation that causes exclusive circulation of wealth only among the rich, and its emphasis on the necessity to prohibit the manipulation of the property which Allah made the sustenance of the ummah, or the emphasis by some nus?s on the view that the purpose of trade is to extract benefits or on the prohibition of hajj if its opening results in evil consequences and so on.
Imam reza network
The Economic System of Islam: Its Ideology
The Ideological Basis of Economic Activity
The ideological basis in Islam may be summarized into six basic principles:
The cornerstone is that everything has to start from the belief in God as the Creator, Lord, and Sovereign of the universe. This implies willingness to submit to God’s will, to accept His guidance, and to have complete and unqualified servitude to Him. This means that Muslims - individually and collectively - should not imitate or emulate any other system if it differs from their particular principles, for example, the system of usury or interest.
The second basic principle is that Islam, as a religion, is a complete way of life; something that guides a person’s life in all its aspects: the moral, social, ethical, economic, political, etc. All of these aspects are based on the guidance of God. Therefore, it is not a question of the person’s acceptance of God’s teaching in one matter and the refusal of acceptance in another. Everything has to be within that basic guidance.
“…And we have revealed to you in stages this book, a clarification of all things, a guidance, a mercy, and glad tidings…” (Quran 16:89)
A third principle is that God created human beings on earth as His trustees, which means that everyone is created to fulfill a certain responsibility on this earth. God has entrusted human beings with free will in order that they live their lives according to the moral and ethical values that He Himself provided. In addition, Islam provides an opportunity in material progress, thereby combining moral, social, and material progress, all interlinked in harmony.
The fourth principle is that God, in order to help humankind to fulfill the responsibility of trusteeship, has made everything in this universe subservient to them. There are many verses in the Quran that suggest this meaning, such as:
“God is He Who made subservient to you the sea that the ships may run therein by His command, and that you may seek of His grace, and that you may give thanks.” (Quran 45:12)
This does not mean, however, that humans are given free reign to use and abuse the resources God has provided us however we choose. Rather, there are many verses that urge humankind to harness the various resources that God has made available to them on this earth responsibly. Humans are encouraged to enjoy of the good things that God has created, but they are to do so within the boundaries that He has given. Doing so is not regarded as sinful as long as it follows His path and does not transgress His limits. God says:
“It is He Who produces gardens, with trellises and without, and dates, and tilth with produce of all kinds, and olives and pomegranates, similar (in kind) and different (in variety): eat of their fruit in their season, but render the dues that are proper on the day that the harvest is gathered. But waste not by excess: for God loves not those who waste.” (Quran 6:141)
The fifth principle is the principle of accountability in the Hereafter. God has given human beings trusteeship and resources. This means that every single person will be questioned on the Day of Judgment as to how he or she behaved whilst enjoying his or her earthly life. This, of course, includes our economic behavior. God says:
“And then on that Day (the Day of Resurrection) you will be called to account for every comfort and delight [we bestowed upon you].” (Quran 102:8)
The sixth principle is that the variation in wealth among people in itself does not give a person either inferiority or superiority. Rather, poverty and affluence are in the total control of God Who, out of His Infinite Justice and Wisdom, has specified these things for whom he chooses.
“Indeed God increases provision to whom He pleases and straitens it [in regards to others]…” (Quran 13:26)
Affluence, like poverty, is also seen as a trial from God, one through which it is seen what one will do with their wealth – indulge oneself or use constructively in ways legislated in the religion, God says:
“Your wealth and your children are only a trial, whereas God! With Him is a great reward (Paradise).”(Quran 64:15)
After being bestowed with numerous gifts and bounties and a kingdom incomparable to any other on the earth, God in the Quran narrates that Solomon said:
“…This is from the bounties of my Lord, to test me whether I will be thankful or ungrateful…” (Quran 27:40)
God is not concerned with the amount of wealth a person may have amassed, their beauty or color, but rather, His measure of honor is the piety of the hearts. God says:
“On humankind! Indeed We created you from a male and female, and we made you different nations and tribes, that you may come to know one other. Indeed the most honored amongst you are the most God-conscious.” (Quran 49:13)
The Prophet also said:
“Indeed God is not concerned with your appearances nor your wealth, but rather your hearts and deeds.” (Saheeh Muslim)
As one can immediately surmise from these principles that the Islamic economic system is radically different from others, due to the difference of the values upon which it is based. In a capitalist society, one may see certain rules of economics which take precedence over moral and ethical values due to the intrinsic nature and values of that system. The same may be seen in communist, socialist and other societies as well. From the principles mentioned in these articles does the Islamic system of economics spring, striking balance between personal benefit and the benefit of society as a whole, as well as mundane profits and spiritual gains, all which ensure that one gain the Pleasure of the Lord of the Worlds.
islamshia-w
Economics: Concept and Purpose in Islam
In part I of this article, we had examined the prevailing opinions of both religious and secular Muslims, as well as the prevailing system of Zakat in some so-called Muslim countries. We had concluded that the concept and practice of Zakat has been reduced to a lifeless ritual by means of which the rich believe they can gain entry into Heaven in the Hereafter. On the other hand, our Prophet ( pbuh ) acted to establish the Deen of Allah Almighty in Medina by implementing the system of Salaah and Zakat as spelled out in the Quran. In this part we will look closely at this system of Zakat .
If Zakat is one of the pillars of the Deen , it stands to reason that this pillar must stand on a firm foundation. That firm foundation is comprised of each Muslim's unshakable conviction, 100% commitment, utter sincerity, and complete dedication to the belief that the Allah-owned resources on the planet must be made available to all creatures and human beings for their sustenance, nourishment, and growth.
The Arabic word Zakat , with its root Z -K -W means growth and development. A tree is nourished and grows in the presence of Allah-owned resources such as the soil, the rain, the sun, and the air (56:63-72; 80:24-31). Any interference in the flow of any of these resources will retard the growth and development of the tree. Similarly, any individual, group, government, or system which disrupts the natural flow of Allah-owned resources on the planet to all human beings creates an imbalance in society: the rich/poor, the master/slave, the owner/worker. In the West, this awareness is dawning in respect to plants, animal and insect species which are becoming extinct due to this imbalance in nature caused by the actions of human beings.
However, the global economic imbalance continues to grow unchecked because human beings have refused, in their greed, to believe in the basic economic principle of Zakat : unrestricted flow of resources to all human beings (41:10, 50:11, 55:10, 56:73, 79:33, and 80:32).
The capitalist New World Order of the West actively seeks to control the natural resources of weaker nations under the guise of "global economic security." Using the United Nations as a tool, the weak are intimidated into submission either through economic sanctions or military force. Allama Iqbal beautifully captured this mentality of the powerful when he said: "Hai wo sultan ghair ki kheti pe ho jiski nazar." (The master is one who always has an eye on others' lands.) Muslims, too, have abandoned the Quranic Zakat , which is Allah's assured challenge to this naked exploitation of the weak by the strong. Unlike other religions, Islam is a Deen , a system of life, a constitutionally-run, collective life that encompasses the social, economic, political, judicial, and military aspects of a community. The leaders of this community are not priests, or scholars, or the rich, or the strong: they are the most upright who commit to upholding the laws of Allah Almighty in the land, " Amr bil ma'aroof " (enjoining what is right) and " Nahya 'anil munkar " (forbidding what is wrong). They make sure the Quran, the Constitution of Allah, is en acted i.e. put into action.
What then, is the position of the Quran on the Economic World Order that should prevail, in other words, Zakat ? The Quran emphasizes the importance of economics in human life. While describing the life of Heaven, the Quran says there will be no hunger and no misery there.
"There is therein (enough provision) for thee not to go hungry nor to go naked." [Yusuf Ali (20:118)]
Too, the Quran teaches us to work for the good of this life, as well as the hereafter (2:201, 7:156), in contrast to the mindset of those who consider economic prosperity in this life to be an end in itself. According to the Quran, such people live at the animal level:
"Verily Allah Almighty will admit those who believe and do righteous deeds, to Gardens beneath which rivers flow; while those who reject Allah Almighty will enjoy (this world) and eat as cattle eat; and the Fire will be their abode." [Yusuf Ali (47:12)]
Taqwaa (righteous works) includes the use of economic prosperity to achieve a higher and nobler goal (10:63-64, 16:30). Economic prosperity is a means, not an end; it is a source for life, not the end of life; it is a prerequisite for growth and development in life, not the final goal of life. Since economic prosperity is so essential to human growth and development, Allah Almighty has addressed the issue of Zakat in great depth in the Quran.
To begin with, Allah Almighty says He is Rahman and Rahim :
"There is no moving creature on earth but its sustenance dependeth on Allah: He knoweth the time and place of its definite abode and its temporary deposit: All is in a clear Record." [Yusuf Ali (11:6)]
"How many are the creatures that carry not their own sustenance? It is Allah Almighty who feeds (both) them and you: for He hears and knows (all things)." [Yusuf Ali (29:60). Also see verses (6:152) and (17:31)]
Allah, of course, does not personally feed anyone: And when they are told, "Spend ye of (the bounties) with which God has provided you," the Unbelievers say to those who believe: "Shall we then feed those whom, if God had so willed, He would have fed, (Himself)?- Ye are in nothing but manifest error." [Yusuf Ali (36:47)]
Allah Almighty fulfills this promise by creating the resources for the nourishment and growth of all moving creatures. No one, therefore, has the right to own or control the Allah-given natural resources or to restrict their flow to humanity at large (107:7, 17:20). Otherwise, this is tantamount to belying the Deen of Allah Almighty (107:1-6). Any association or partnership with Allah Almighty in this respect is Shirk , an unforgivable sin in the sight of Allah. Allah Almighty says:
"Join not anything as equal with Him; be good to your parents; Kill not your children on a plea of Want- We provide sustenance for you and for them ." [Yusuf Ali 6:151]
Secondly, Allah Almighty is clearly the real owner of the resources He has created. The following verses in the Quran leave no doubt about this:
The earth and all its resources belong to Allah. It is such an obvious fact that no one can deny it (6:12, 10:31, 29:61 &63, 31:25, 34:24, 39:10 &38, 43:9).
· Allah Almighty is the inheritor of the earth (19:40). The earth has been created for the benefit of all (55:10).
It has been created to provide nourishment for all (56:73).
To Him belongs all that is in heavens and the earth, "La hu ma fissamawati fil ardh" (2:116, 2:255, 4:171, 5:40, 14:2, 16:52, 20:6, 22:64).
"Lillahi ma fissamawati fil ardh" (2:284, 3:109, 3:129, 4:131,132, 5:40, 10:55, 10:67, 14:2, 16:52, 20:6, 21:19, 34:1, 42:4, 42:53, 53:21).
"Lillahi miraathus samaawaatti wal ardh" (3:180).
As Owner, then, Allah Almighty has given us these resources as a trust which we are required to disburse according to His Will (the system of Zakat ), which is, to make available to all living creatures according to their needs, without any hindrance or control, the sustenance and provisions of life.
It was the Prophet's ( pbuh ) unshakable conviction, his utter commitment, and total obedience to this system of Zakat that led to the establishment of the basic infrastructure of a universal, welfare-based economic system in Medina
Shirk - Associating Other Owners Besides Allah Almighty to the Ownership of the Earth
Since Allah Almighty owns the Earth and its resources, then no one else can be an owner. A simple example illustrates this well: I wish to buy a piece of land. The seller and I sign the papers, and legally, I become the new owner. But if we carry this process back far enough, a point will come where this mutual deal will come to an end. Someone must have acquired that land illegally at first without any mutual agreement. Now, in legal jargon, any illegally acquired property, no matter how many times it is bought and sold thereafter, remains illegal. So, how can I say that "I" am the "legal" owner of that land? In my own defense I may claim that I acquired the land "legally," or that it is not my responsibility to worry about someone else's very first illegal acquisition of that land, or that I bought it from halal earned income, so I "own" it. But it does not change the reality - I am involved in a deal which was Shirk to begin with. And, as long as I believe in "my ownership," I am involved in Shirk .
Brothers and sisters! It is not difficult to understand this kind of Shirk if our hearts and minds are open and sincere. According to the Quran, Muslim believers are required to enter into a contract with Allah Almighty in which they must sell their life and wealth to Him in exchange for Jannah : "Allah Almighty hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise)" [Yusuf Ali 9:111]
But, if we cling to the attitude that we own our life and wealth (in violation of the above ayah) then how can we practice and establish Zakat ? First, this Shirk (having two owners, Allah Almighty and us) has to be slowly and gradually eliminated before the tree of Zakat can take firm root in a land rooted in Tauheed (with Allah Almighty only being the owner of everything including our lives) and not in Shirk (in which others are also owners along with Allah). That is where Sadaqaa or charity comes in.
What is Sadaqaa ?
Our Islamic scholars interpret both Zakat and Sadaqaa as charity. And whatever instruction Allah Almighty has given in the Quran in the following verse for Sadaqaat they attribute it to Zakat .
Alms [Sadaqaat] are for the poor and the needy, and those employed to administer the (funds); for those whose hearts have been (recently) reconciled (to Truth); for those in bondage and in debt; in the cause of God; and for the wayfarer: (thus is it) ordained by God, and God is full of knowledge and wisdom. [Yusuf Ali (9:60)]
But, first of all, why would Allah Almighty use two different terms if they mean exactly the same thing? It does not make sense. Secondly, the Arabic language also does not support it. While the root meaning of Zakat comes from Z-K-W , meaning growth and development, the root meaning of Sadaqaa comes from the root S-D-Q , meaning truth and power. Therefore, all the words that are derived from this root will have these two meanings (truth and power) embedded in them. Siddeeq is one who proves his trust and belief by his actions. As-Sadaqatu is anything that is given in the way of Allah Almighty voluntarily to prove one's promise and belief in Him as opposed to Zakat , which is compulsory [Tajul 'Uroos]. Therefore, Sadaqqa has a different purpose in Islam than Zakat and both cannot be equated with each other. How can income tax (a compulsory thing) be equated with charity (a voluntary thing)? .
islamshia-w
Zakat - Islamic Economy Purpose in Islam
The economics of Zakat and its relevance to modern times is a hotly debated issue among both religious and liberal Muslims. This series of articles will attempt to explain the concept of Zakat in the light of only the Quran and the faithful implementation of this concept by our Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). We will see how a similarly implemented system can solve the current economic problems of not just Muslim Countries, but of the World.
Zakat - First Universal Welfare System
Contrary to the beliefs of both religious and secular Muslims, the Prophet Muhammad achievements were based not on ephemeral but on the permanent values of the Quran. He brought about the greatest revolution, even an economic and political miracle in human history (see Michael Hart, THE 100, pages 3-10). In a very short time after the prophet migrated to Medina and implemented the system of salaat and zakat, the economic condition of the people changed.
* (For a detailed discussion about the system of salaat, see a two part article in MONITOR, pages 6-10, September/October 1998, and pages 7-12, December1998/January 1999)
The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is reported to have said; If a single person were to sleep hungry in a town, then God's protection is lifted from that town -[Masnad Imam Ahmad]. This hadith emphasizes that no one (Muslims or non Muslims) under this system should go hungry. Thus this zakat system created the first universal welfare system in human history. It also gradually transformed the existing slave based economy to a universal welfare based economy. By the end of the Prophet's period, the entire Arabian Peninsula enjoyed economic as well as political security. This system reached its pinnacle during Khalifa Umar's time (again, see Michael Hart, THE 100, pages 261-265), a time when, history tells us, hardly anyone was in need of charity.
What has occurred then in the intervening years that the Muslims masses are suffering economic deprivation even though they live in areas with plenty of natural resources?
What Happened Then?
Muslims and non Muslims alike ask the question; If the system implemented by our Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and Sahabaa (r) was so good, why did it not continue? The answer is simple, we changed or abandoned the system implemented by the Prophet Muhammad. Instead of deciding matters with open consultation, as the Quran requires, the Ummayad and Abbasid dynastic rulers created a dictatorship under the guise of " Shari'iah " and " Ijma'a ". This was a ploy to fool the people. The rulers first acquired illegal political authority, and then delegated religious authority to Imams appointed by themselves.
Thus they hijacked the train of Islam from the track of our Prophet (pbuh) and his Sahabba (r) and put it on a new track called " Shari'ah ." Since then, a minority of the rich and powerful has been riding this train and entertaining their friends while exploiting the vast majority of Muslims along the way. Consequently, common Muslims have continued to live in poverty and to suffer intergenerational economic misery. Islam's system of Zakat has had nothing to do with this sad state of affairs.
Zakat & Our Approach
Today, we are taught that zakat is one of the pillars of Islam. Zakat is generally translated as charity or poor due and it is required to be distributed according to the details given in the Shariah. However, the descendents of the Prophet (pbuh), generally known as "Syeds" in the Indian subcontinent are forbidden to take zakat according to this Shariah. No matter how poor, they are considered superior by birth compared to other Muslims due to their supposed relationship with the Prophet (pbuh). Obviously, this is against our Prophet's Sunnah since he proclaimed justice, fairness, and equality for all, regardless of family or blood relationship.
The dispensation of zakat is regulated by different rates (called shar'h ) for different items called (nisaab) whose details are given in books of hadith and Fiqh. Zakat on money is 2.5% of the savings over a period of one year according to the Shari'ah. There are many conditions attached to the giving and receiving of zakat. There is no uniformity even among the Sunnis in the restrictions, rates and even the items of zakat.
In addition, there are different books of Fiqh and Shari'ah for different Muslim sects or schools of thought! Although Islamic scholars know about these differences in zakah among the Muslim sects, they rarely bring them out into the open, since it is in the interest of these scholars to keep the people ignorant.
The differences in zakat among the four Sunni Imams are not as major as among the Sunni and Shi'ia Imams. For example, in Fiqh Jaffariah , there is no zakat on paper currency. So, for the followers of this Fiqh there is no Zakat on bank accounts. When General Zia-ul-Haq, the Pakistani military ruler instituted compulsory zakat in Pakistan, the Shi'ia 'Ulema revolted against it and refused to abide by the government's zakat ordinance. Ultimately the government excluded Shi'ias from the yearly bank account deductions. This led many Sunnis to declare themselves Shi'ias on their bank forms to avoid paying zakat on their bank accounts.
Zakat - Conclusion
Dear sisters and brothers! We must re-turn to the true spirit of the Quran; we must have the courage to follow the Islam of our Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), which requires real sacrifice and a drastic change in our lifestyles. We must go back to the Quran as the primary source, and not to the rulings of Islamic scholars from the time of the Ummayad and Abbasid rulers.
In Part 2 of this article we will look at the real meaning and significance of zakah - the Arabic word zakah with its root z-k-w , which means growth and development, not charity or poor-due. Keeping this meaning in full view, zakat is supposed to ultimately lead to growth and development of all human beings; it is supposed to remove the need for charity or poor-due in the long term. We will see how zakat not only leads to the economic progress of individuals and all human beings but to their spiritual progress as well. We will also note the difference between Sadaqaa and Zakat.
islamshia-w
Economic Distribution in Islam
"Whatever spoils given by Allah to His Messenger from townspeople belongs to Allah and to the Messenger, and to the nearest of kin, and to the orphans, and the indigent, and the wayfarer, so that it may not circulate amongst the rich of you. And what the Messenger gives you, take it then; but forsake what he forbids you. And venerate Allah, for He is stern in retribution." Holy Qur'an (59:7)
"Were it my money I would have distributed it among them equally. But it is Allah's." Imam Ali (a.s.)
PREFACE
Praise is due to Allah for His explicit and implicit favours. Peace and blessings are on the brilliant light, the giver of good tidings and warnings, our master Muhammad and on his infallible household and the righteous among his companions.
Today, the world appears to becoming more lost in self-generated chaoses economic problems take precedence over all other hardships and haunt the rulers of both the Eastern and Western blocks.
If the West suffers from high unemployment, high inflation...etc., the East complains of decline in production, shortages in the supply of the basic necessities of life... Both capitalism and socialism, including before being developed into communism, are not only retracting their theoretical slogans and renouncing their doctrinal principles, they are nearly perishing as each are riddled with ambiguities and shortcomings that have failed to address even the most fundamental issues of con temporary society.
Satellite states, like in the Arab world, have been dominated by the Western democracies and as a result, have been misled in setting up capitalistic systems or they have reluctantly turned tificsocialism. The result from both should announce their ideologies has been only bitter disappointment. Nothing has remained in their hands except the ashes of aping foreigners, which are being scattered by the piercing wind of the Islamic movement.
Both the East and the West have claimed their absolute dependence on the outcome of abstract theories, not only in the fields of material sciences but even in their ideological and philosophical views with regard to the universe, life and man. Each attach the uppermost importance to tangible experiments to prove facts and adopt the ensuing results. But, contrary to all their claimed developments, the examples of socialism and capitalism in practice have proved to be fiascoes, neither imparting happiness to man nor satisfying his basic needs, both physical and spiritual; in failing to achieve worldwide security or putting an end to global catastrophes, instead cultural erosion and moral collapse, continue to increase unabated, while there has been no sign of pinpointing the root causes of anxiety and psychological misery that is sweeping virtually all nations today.
As the Foundation presents this booklet about economic distribution in Islam, free of charge, it is a single proof of the greatness of Islam and looks forward to the day when humanity will shake worldly dust of fits communities and become arrayed with celestial robes to walk in the light of Islam, where happiness can be won in both this life and the Hereafter.
"...and to whomever Allah does not give light, he has no light." Holy Qur'an (24:40)
ISLAM'S CARE FOR MAN'S LIVELIHOOD
Today, economic problems come at the head of man's present plights. They may be considered the root of life's problems that leave a pervasive impact on man's material interests and social conditions. The result has a direct effect not only on the life of the individual but also on the community and on the level of their material progress and civil development.
Economic conditions of the ummah (Muslim community), like elsewhere, have a backlash on security and stability, and consequently, advances in health, scientific gains and the process of achieving social justice. In Islam, life's stability is viewed as a base in up a committed Muslim community. Similarly, catering man's basic necessities is a factor conducive to solidifying piety and winning divine rewards in the Hereafter.
Present life and the Hereafter, economic welfare and moral and spiritual ascendancy are tightly connected together through a sound insight in having all-embracing way of life, which only Islam can offer.
Allah, the Exalted, says: "And seek by means of what Allah has given you the future abode, and do not neglect your portion of this world,..." Holy Qur'an (28:77)
A Prophetic tradition from the Holy Messenger (s.a.w.) pointedly records: "He is not from us who gives up his worldly life in favour of his Hereafter, nor is he who gives up his Hereafter in favour of his worldly life."
The Prophet (s.a.w.) is further quoted to saying: "How excellent is wealthiness in strengthening man's fear of Allah".[1]
Imam al-Sadiq (a.s.), in interpreting the following verse, (...Our Lord! grant us good in this world and in the Hereafter, and save us from the punishment of the fire) (Qur'an 2:201) has elaborated that the good referred is associated together in seeking the pleasure of Allah and Paradise in the Hereafter and the provision and good morals in worldly life.[2]
Imam al-Sadiq (a.s.) is quoted himself to have said: "There is no good in him who does not like to collect wealth lawfully, by which he satisfies his needs, pays off his debts and keeps up his relations with his relatives".[3]
"How excellent is worldly life when it helps one to prepare oneself for the Hereafter".
"Wealthiness that prevents you from wronging others is better than poverty that leads you to do evils."[4]
The Prophet (s.a.w.) has also said:- "O Lord! make bread blessed for us. Do not separate us form it. If it were not for bread we would not have kept up prayers, fast not have discharged our divine duties."[5]
"It is better for the faithful to wake in the morning or in the evening at the loss of a beloved one than to go in the morning or the evening plundering others' property. We take refuge in Allah from plundering others' possessions."[6]
Through these Islamic texts about the importance of the economic side of man's life, the role of the growth of money and wealth in a Muslim's life, in relation to his quest on earth can be seen. They present a clear understanding of Islam's concern with economic life and the necessity of fair distribution of wealth, and the providing of a satisfactory standard of living to every individual so as to keep his faith sound and his life stable.
Based on this plain concept is Islam's stress on man's managing his financial life and its concern to set up a fair economic system based on the belief in man's lawful right to satisfy his natural needs. These include providing an adequacy of foodstuff, clothing, residence and the rest of material, ideological and psychological needs on whose availability, the justice of an economic system and the betterment of the community's welfare depend.
Qur'anic ayahs (verses) and Prophetic traditions are bountiful in dealing with thc concerns of everyday economic life of individuals. So exactly and meticulously they attend to production, earnings, distribution of wealth, management of money and all aspects of the economy that they never fail to draw admiration of economists and political scientists the world over.
How excellently perfect is the Qur'anic concept of Islam's view of daily economic life in which it confirms man' s right to gain comfort. It is vividly expressed in this Qur'anic address to Adam (a.s.): "Surely it is (ordained for you that you shall not be hungry therein nor bare of clothing." Holy Qur'an (20:118)
Man's economic needs should be met, whether he himself, achieves this goal or someone else, be it an individual, a group of people or the state. The following verse enriches this concept: "...so let them worship the Lord of this House, Who feeds them against hungry and gives them security against fear." Holy Qur'an (106:3-4)
It makes it clearer and more positive the connection of Allah's worthiness of being worshipped to favouring man by providing his basic necessities of life. Tackling starvation and furnishing the basic economic needs of man, in the shadow of peace and security and is explained by this verse. It is a sacred feature of man's relationship with Allah and a stimulus to worship and submit to His will.
It is quite evident, in Islam's view, that the issues raised and questions emerging from thanksgiving, or to which worship is related, must be the focus of man's concern. They must be provided, for they form the path leading to worship and the causes of thankfulness and gratitude.
In a nutshell, Islam's view of man's rights to earn a daily living, can be outlined as:-
1. Money and property are Allah's. People are equal in gaining them and making use of them. Imam Ali (a.s.) is reported to have said: "Were it my money I would have distributed it among them equally. But it is Allah's."
2. Man has an inalienable right to earn his livelihood. Under no circumstances should he be deprived of it and at the time of infirmity or incapability, it must be provided for him.
3. Man is obliged to exert his utmost efforts in working and utilizing nature's resources to his interests. Allah, the Exalted, says: "...therefore go about in the spacious sides thereof, and eat of His provision, and to Him is the return after death." Holy Qur'an (67:15)
4. The system of economic life and the methods of earning money, distributing wealth and consumption should be in accordance with a specific moral and legal line. Man's freedom and his economic rights should be similarly subjected to this lawful commitment, which safeguards the rights of all and balances everyone's interests.
MISCONCEPTIONS
Two main points related to the economic system and the distribution of wealth and productivity in Islam, need further consideration as a prelude to delve into related issues. Primarily they are:
1. Islamic economic thought has become vague in the minds of many scholars and cultured people and has led them to deny the existence of such system in Islam. This has been caused on the basis that Muslim thinkers have not studied economic and financial percepts and concepts and presented them in a related way in which contemporary thought has tackled them and treated within modern idioms and methodology.
It is due to this lack of development that Islamic economic thought has remained texts and concepts scattered in the Holy Qur'an, books of traditions, books of history and Islamic studies on fiqh (jurisprudence).
Muslim researchers did not consider them except in the recent past and in a limited and narrow scope. The need has been to have them to be more meticulously examined, gathered, studied, analyzed, deduced and reshaped and where the outcome should be easily comprehensible and encapsulates all man's economic problems as well as covering all related aspects, such as the themes of wealth, its production and distribution within the Muslim community.
In respect, the fuqaha' took great pains to study these items extensively on the basis of fiqh. They also examined zakat (poor-rate), khums (an Islamic tax), kharaj (land tax levied on non-Muslims), working systems for companies, trade, ijarah (hiring someone or something for specific purposes), hawalah (transfer of debt from one person to another), purchases, usury, farming, speculation, usurpation, property, conduct of business...etc. By so doing, they provided basic ideological material conducive to form an economic view, and a clear-cut viewpoint on an Islamic economic system. Many contemporary Muslim intellectuals have made use of this basic ideological material and studied economic systems, ownership, distribution, consumption...in its light. They have also developed it in analyzing production relationships and offering an explanation to economic problems and so forth.
When Muslim intellectuals systematically delve into this field, in line with Islam's methodology of research and employing a comprehensive economic method, an economic overview can be presented, that make up entire systems providing solutions for man's problems, for which he has failed to find an answer. Instead man has been left groping in the long dark tunnels of the communist, socialist and capitalist theories, when satisfactory answers are at hand to alleviate doubts adduced by the enemies of Islam. Such have spared no effort to present, to the sons of Islam and others, that Islamic economic thought is a shallow mould, which is unable to accommodate today's problems. They charge Islam, due to their ignorance, obstinacy, and fear from its justice, as well as its threat to their boundless self-centeredness and greed, that it falls short of successfully treating the more complicated daily economic issues. Islamic economic system is still, as they maliciously claim, composed of a set of varying charity-oriented questions and moral commandments, which cannot tackle deep-seated problems, nor can it resolve the ever-complicated crises of inhumanity because of the immense phenomena, related to financial considerations present in human society.
These efforts are clearly made in a bid to turn attention of Muslims and others from returning to an economic system that frees humanity from exploitation, injustice and avarice and leads it to an economic life of welfare, where man finds comfort, care and dignity.
2. The second misconception, which must be warned of, is the mixing up of Islam with other economic systems and without distinguishing between the two. Many researchers and academics, be they Muslims or non-Muslims still mingle the Islamic economic system with the capitalist and social systems. Even, some of them go to the extent of mixing it up with the communist systems. This confusion can be ascribed to the comprehensible concepts found in Islam, including the principles of freedom, sponsorship, insurance or through the intervention of the Islamic state in directing the economy and keeping watch over the distribution and production.. etc.
Those, who examine the conception of economic, political and individual freedom in Islam, look at Islam within a capitalist framework. Yet those, observe Islam's rejection of, for instance, the capitalist amassing of wealth or the state's role in economic life, think Islam is a socialist system.
Re-examining these ideological aspects and analyzing them scientifically, meticulously and unbiasedly, it will be noticed however, that there is a wide gap between Islam's view and cures and those of capitalism and socialism. The only conclusions that can be made about attempts to converge manmade systems with Islam is that they are clear distortions in line with other misconception that are invented to belittle the everlasting message of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.).
To emphasize the difference, the following four points underline the key difference between Islam and these two ideological system, in particular, and other social and political systems, in general:
1. Islam differs from socialism, capitalism and communism and other theories and perspectives in its ideological and doctrinal bases. Islam is a Divine Message with a special conception of the universe, life and man. It basically disagrees with socialist and capitalist views, which have their roots in their materialistic vision that has no religious base, nor any belief in Allah.
Socialism, capitalism and communism and the like are merely concepts devoid of spiritual and moral values. The distance between them and Islam is unmistakably great. Islam has an all-embracing ideological and legislative make-up. In it, no barriers are to be found between morals, laws, worships, concepts and existence.
2. Islam differs from all man-made systems in that it has a lawful executive framework, which exactly expresses political, economic, and social concepts. Regarding the social system[7], laws, which are the second stage of its ideological ladder, are based on founding principles of their own. They manage related affairs quite differently from man-written laws and legislation, in all domains whether they be economical, political, sociological, or appertaining to individual behaviour...etc.
Such matters as ownership, investment, economic, consumption are tackled in a unique way by Islam.
3. In its aims and objectives, Islam is distinguished from other systems, like, it differs from them on the basis of contents and the legal organization of life. It treats related subjects in separate ways with specific points. The ultimate goal of Islam is to worship and seek the pleasure of Allah, the Exalted.
In implementing the divine law and adhering to the divine order, a Muslim demonstrates he is a worshipper. His objective is to seek the reward and pleasure of Allah, the Exalted.
Contrarily, the human objective in capitalist and socialist societies is purely a materialistic one, expressed in terms of materialistic gain regardless of the cost and fall out on society.
4. Even though there is a sort of analogy between Islam and other systems in certain respects, Islam has its own way and method of implementing its economic concepts and objectives.
For example, Islam believes in social justice and so it adopts just principles in distribution and production growth.
Socialism and capitalism attempt to call for similar concepts, which can be seen as generally logical and which man, by no means, can shun. But in trying to develop the conceptions and implement them, we will find the difference between Islam and secular systems in both method and way. In capitalism, freedom knows no boundaries. In theory, individuals can do what they desire to. In doing so, it believes that the non-existence of limits or restrictions results in economic freedom, in competition and the increase of production. But to achieve a suitable and satisfactory economic level is for all people, makeshift and inexorable laws have to be enforced, based upon such theories as the laws of wages, supply and demand...etc. while, on the other hand, socialism subscribes to the methods of confiscating the sources of wealth and means of production. The state, thanks to this system, becomes a massive capitalist party monopolizing all means of economic resources and turns individuals into production units, who take nothing from the fruit of their toil except that which the state allows them to have.
Unlike these two systems Islam adopts its own methods. It never opens the gates for individual selfishness to flourish like in capitalism, nor does it confiscate the means of production and acquiring wealth, turning people into machines on behalf of the state, like socialism. Islam believes in individual ownership, community ownership and state ownership, as it is expounded in the books of fiqh, traditions and in the Holy Qur'an. Lest selfishness and urges of greed prevail, and to prevent exploitation and economic injustice from sweeping over the community, Islam has laid down lawful and moral restrictions related to ownership, investment and consumption in defense of manipulation and deprivation.
The aim, which has in view, as duly explained, is to liberate man from both the greedy capitalist grip solidified by the democratic system and state capitalism thrust upon productive individuals in the socialist system by means of coercion and force, which are the monopoly of the government. In conformity with a delicately set economic plan, Islam grants freedom and responsibility to the Muslim individual and community within bounds so each balance the other.
NATURE OF ECONOMIC PROBLEM
The central question which presents itself in the world of economics and wealth and which needs a comprehensive and exact answer is: What is the economic problem and what is its cause?
The answer to this question depends upon what is the approach and the nature of the system chosen. The identity of the economic system, which manages the distribution of wealth among human beings, conversely is outlined in accordance with the general comprehension of the problem and its nature. The solution to any economic problem thus lies within the system, in its formula. It gives the answer to the question, what the economic problem is and how it can be dealt with.
To analyze the problem overall from a philosophical point of view needs a comprehensive grasp of the nature of both man and wealth, the value of each and their significance in life as a prerequisite. It further relies on a deep, exact and efficient comprehension of the problem on one hand, and on the other, an objective analysis of the implemented system, which is immune to any prejudice that may caused by the personal bias of the concerned economist and those who invented its perspectives.
These factors, put together, help to give the shape of the answer and to plan an economic system with its stated hallmarks.
Now, let us see what answer Islam gives to our question: What is the economic problem and what is its mainspring?
1. Allah, the Exalted, says: "Corruption has appeared in the land and the sea on account of what the hands of people have wrought, that he may make them taste a part of that which they have done, so that they may return." Holy Qur'an (30:41)
2. And Allah has also said: "And you love wealth with exceeding love." Holy Qur'an (89:20)
3. "Decked out fair to mankind is the love of desires -Women, children, hoarded treasures of gold and silver, marked horses, cattle and tilth. That is the enjoyment of the life of this world; but Allah - with Him is the fairest return. Say: 'Shall I tell you of better than that?' For those that are godfearing, with their Lord are Gardens underneath which rivers flow, therein dwelling forever, purified spouse, and Allah's good pleasure. And Allah sees His servants." Holy Qur'an (3:14-15)
4. "...most surely man is ungrateful to his Lord. And most surely he is a witness of that. And most surely he is tenacious in the love of wealth..." Holy Qur'an (100:6-8)
5. "And those who made their abode in the city and in the faith before them love those who have fled to them, and do not find in their hearts a need of what they are given, and prefer (them) before themselves though poverty may afflict them, and whoever is preserved from the niggardliness of his soul, these it is that are the successful ones." Holy Qur'an (59:9)
6. "Therefore be careful of (your duty to) Allah as much as you can, an hear and obey and spend, it is better for your souls; and whoever is saved from the greediness of his soul, these it is that are the successful." Holy Qur'an (64:16)
7. The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.) is reported to have said: "Refrain from doing injustice, for it is the darkness of the Judgement's Day. Avoid misery, it was misery that cut down those who were before you. It made them shed their blood and do haram (what is forbidden and harmful)".
8. And the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.) is also quoted to have said: "Two fierce wolves entering a pen of sheep are not as much harmful as avarice and love of a social rank to the faith of a Muslim."[8]
Examining these quotations and compile their content, the following conclusions can be reached:
1. In the first quotation, the Qur'an blames man for causing his own problem. Corruption, be it political, economic or moral, is only man's making. Man encapsulates a host of stimuli and desires and he himself is spurred on to extremes in peculiar proclivities, to cause corruption, injustice and tyranny under which humanity suffers greatly.
"Corruption has appeared in the land and the sea on account of what the hands of people have wrought, that he may make them taste a part of that which they have done, so that they may return." Holy Qur'an (30:41)
2. Quotations 2,3,4 and 8 emphasize that man' s selfishness, avarice, his excessive love for properly and wealth and his tendency to amass them, is the main cause of all his daily problems, in general, and his economic problems, in particular.
3. Quotations 5,6 and 7, from the Qur'an and holy Prophetic traditions, how that avarice itself which is a vice used with great eagerness and desire to obtain and keep wealth away from the bands of others, is the latent, effective factor behind man's greed and his predilection to monopoly wealth and deprive others from it.
In summary, we can assert an important fact in the world of economics, as clearly stated by Islam and known as the causeehind the problem of wealth distribution, is man's self-centeredness and his greed. For the worlds of the holy Qur'anic verses and Prophetic traditions lay great stress on avarice and greed as the root causes of the economic problems in the fields of distribution and consumption.
This view rules out the effect of external conditions, including means of production, whether in abundance or scarce, and distribution, for man, himself, controls distribution, His will controls it. His awareness identifies his view of justice, the value of money and wealth and the meaning of life. It is this very awareness that principally outlines the way he adopts in dealing with himself and others.
Everywhere and every time subjective factors are the root causes of the problems and the sources of economic injustice, regardless of the variation in conditions, means and quantity of production, which tend themselves to be by-products resulting from the original misdiagnosis.
The only way to save man from economic injustice and confusion is his daily life, re-shaping his existence and re-formulating his conceptions, his view of life, money, wealth, profit and moral pleasure, in a sound and objective way and in harmony with the Qur'an and in agreement with its deep, analytical views.
Allah, the Exalted, says: "...surely Allah does not change the condition of a people until they change their own condition;..." Holy Qur'an (13:11)
Unless an independent, economic system is adhered to this change cannot be fully successful; a system, which takes upon itself the task of re-distributing human wealth and managing economic life in agreement with the principles of Islamic justice and equality and not on high-fluting theories that lose the essence of what the basic problem is:
Allah, the Exalted, says: "And that if they should keep to the (right) way, We would certainly give them to drink of abundant water." Holy Qur'an (72:16)
"And if the people of the towns had believed and guarded (against evil) We would certainly have opened up for them blessings from the heaven and the earth..." Holy Qur'an (7:96)
There is no way to better man's life other than effecting a complete, psychological and ideological transformation. Yet to achieve this, a just system and law must be brought about, both socially and legally, to serve as a prelude in the building of a human community, where man can bask in righteousness and happiness and taste the flavor of freedom and dignity.
The Qur'an, in many of its ayahs and conceptions, emphasizes this method of transformation: "until they change their own condition", "and that if they should keep to the (right) way", "believed and guarded (against evil)."
By scrutinizing these words, we can arrive at the conclusion that the Qur'an made psychological change, and treading on the right path (shari'ah and the Divine system), having faith in them and insisting on adhering to their profound principles. Islam is prerequisite to human change for the better and the sources of good and man's economic welfare.
This is the true dimensions of the problem and overcoming it. But what of the external factor that perpetuate and self-propel the ill-effects?
EXTERNAL FACTORS
Identifying human faults as an internal cause of the economic problem, Islam turns its attention to specify the external factors, which constitute the chief reasons behind exacerbating the problem. Islam, attributes the economic problems to two factors:
1. The Human Factor. The subjective one and root cause as already has been explained.
2. External Factors. The objective ones.
These factors can be deduced, by concerned researchers of Islamic economics, from the sources of legislation, morals, and concepts that deal with the social and economic aspects of man's life. Briefly they can be summed as:
1. INADEQUATE PRODUCTION.
2. ILL-DISTRIBUTION.
3. ILL-CONSUMPTION.
By referring to the Qur'an, Prophetic Sunnah, books of fiqh, studies on morals, we can compile many texts, principles and thoughts which deal with each of these causes. To present a more clearer picture of the Islamic view of the economic problem, it is necessary to consider all three causes separately.
1- INADEQUATE PRODUCTION:
The main cause of poverty as well as being a principle factor behind the economic problem, under whose burden man is still suffering, is the decline in production in the view of Islam. That is why Islam has focused attention on it and blamed two main factors for it:
A. Unemployment and disusing of human resources: Islam looks upon work as a holy and esteemed asset. It puts it on the same footing with jihad and worship. The Prophet (s.a.w.) is reported to have said: "Worship is of seven parts the best of which is seeking halal (lawful) provision."[9]
Islamic traditions and texts dealing with the importance of work are bountiful. They have one aspect in common urging man to work, mobilizing human beings to raise their production capabilities and fighting sloth and unemployment as the prime reasons of poverty and materialistic and social decline.
Of the traditions reported in regard to this point is one quoted from Imam Ali (a.s.): "When things coupled, sloth and helplessness got together and engendered poverty."
Imam al-Ridha (a.s.) quote his father Imam Musa al-Kadhim (a.s.), on the same subject that he said to one of his sons on his death-bed: "Beware of laziness and boredom, because for they prevent you from your share of this world and in the Hereafter."[10]
B. Ignorance and lack of experience about methods of productions, including the under-utilization of natural resources and man's creative powers. These factors play a critical and undeniable role in the decline of production and spread of need and destitution. Islam, for such consideration, urges Muslims to seek knowledge, make use of natural resources and gain in knowledge about work and management. The Prophet (s.a.w.) is quoted to have said: "Allah surely loves the trustworthy professional."
Islam works towards mobilizing man bodily, psychologically and intellectually, employing his technical and scientific abilities for the sake of production, adequate supplies of needed commodities, and creating wealth. The Prophet (s.a.w.) reproached whoever has no interest in increasing his wealth through halal (lawful) work and expanding his ability to spend and meet his needs and the needs of his dependants.
In the words of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.): "There is no good in whoever who does not like earning his living from halal work to satisfy his needs, pays his debts, and strengthen his ties of kinship".
This Prophetic tradition emphasizes the necessity of man striving to earn his own way; that his earnings should outweigh his expenses. The Prophet (s.a.w.) laid stress Oil this point in: "relation to the good of his family and the community as a whole".
Islam's plan is simple and precise, directing man's energies into productive employment as a moral responsibility and a legal duty that fits into building a healthy Muslim society, where there is no unmet wanting.
2. ILL-DISTRIBUTION:
Bad distribution is the second gravest external cause of the economic problem, which also results in the spread of poverty and need, and unbalanced economic life. As clearly seen from secular systems, different social classes have arisen. One of them lives in the lap of luxury, enjoying every kind of material pleasure, a massing wealth, monopolizing means and sources of riches. While the other is hardly able to have daily bread and scrape together a subsistence living.
This gross inequality in economic life, which represents a dangerous and harmful schism in society, has its main causes principally in bad distribution and the implementation of bland, man-made economic systems which have their own momentum is aggravating the catastrophe. Feudalism, capitalism, and communism and the like have merely exacerbated the crisis all the more.
Ill-distribution, has a long historic experience, regardless of whatever secular economic system has been tried. Its consequence of an unjust spread of wealth is a prime basis of today's social tragedy of mankind.
Such is well established, by Muslim and non-Muslim experts alike, as exampled by one report in an Italian publication, and translated and published in the Kuwaiti daily "al-Qabas", back on August 15-8-1976 in its issue 1525:- "Experts in the fields of development, food and population unanimously agree that the available natural resources in the world are so abundant that they can meet all the needs of the nations if goodwill was shown and if these resources were equally distributed among all nations. The root cause is the unjust distribution of the resources...and the failure of many nations to win their real independence, decide the fate of their wealth and distribute it justly and fairly.
"Russian scientist Ivan Shatilov has also said that cultivated areas now could satisfy the hunger of tens of billions of people if their crops were distributed equally and fairly among the nations of the world. He further points out: 'On the other hand, we must not lose sight of the fact that the advanced industrialized world has not, sofar, made use of the marine sources of food. The oceans constitute 71 percent of the total surface of the earth, whereas they produce no more that 1 percent of man's foodstuff.'"
Man will never be able to taste the flavor of happiness and dignity, as historical records testify, unless he sheds the shackles of short-sighted man-made systems, and blot out forever their traces in the human community, souls and life. Such systems proved themselves a failure. They only record their flagrant, tragic defeat, which victimize humanity and brings forth unspeakable cries of starvation, wars and deprivations. Man was metamorphosed into a machine working incessantly in favour of the ruling classes, whether being individuals as is the case in the capitalist and feudalis systems, or authorities, and parties as it is in the socialist and communist systems.
Only when man recovers his consciousness from the anaesthesia of propaganda manipulated by those who covet these principles from their won vested interest and breaks the fetters of servitude which subdues him by force and coercion, man will see the fountain of light and find the path to an honorable, free life, where he finds his righteousness and dignity. Only when man strives to seeks and intensifies his efforts to win good and happiness will he find the key presented by Islam.
This concise discourse, is not intended to delve into great detail the major principles and important lines drawn by Islam in its unmatched economic system. It is but an outline of its just view.
3. ILL-CONSUMPTION:
The major third factor conducive to the economic problem and perpetuating the spread of poverty and destruction of human resources is ill-consumption, which the misuse of wealth and the non-usage of assets that could preserve and satisfy human demands in a calculated balanced way.
Like all other fields, Islam has a unique diagnosis for consumption in its particularly caring way of embracing a complete formula for life. Its guidelines show the following steps:-
1. Limiting Consumption:
Consumption is the most critical stage in dealing with the wealth and making use of it and Islam did not neglect this vital area but set a system with clear moral aspects that controls the process, utilizing the graces and favours bestowed on man by Allah.
So that man would not act excessively or unreasonably in regard to consuming life's resources, Islam projects a well-laid system, calculated and in accordance with its message and its distinctive way of handling matters at man's disposal.
2. Prohibition of Extravagance and Wastefulness:
Extravagance and wastefulness are nothing but harmful misusages of wealth. Islam exhorted man to confine himself to the necessities of life and to keep his lusts, avarice and the untoward behaviour in check.
Allah, the Exalted, says: "O children of Adam! attend to your embellishments at every time of prayer, and eat and drink and be not extravagant; surely He does not love the extravagant." Holy Qur'an (7:31)
"And they who when they spend, are neither extravagant nor parimonious, and (keep) between these the just mean." Holy Qur'an (25:67)
"And give to the near of kin his due and (to) the needy and the wayfarer, and do not squander wastefully. Surely the squanderers are the brothers of the Satan and Satan is ever ungrateful to his Lord." Holy Qur'an (17:26-27)
"And do not make your hand to be shackled to your neck nor stretch it forth to the utmost (limit) of its stretching forth, lest you should (afterwards) sit down blamed, stripped off ." Holy Qur'an (17:29)
These exhortation and restrictions were purely to keep a balanced economy . perfectly organized. If wealth is employed in the interest of man, used as it was ordained and planned by Allah, all human needs are met.
Islam, in its legislation and perceptions, erect a structure of logical bases compatible with human make-up and instinctive needs.
Because man cannot always handle wealth, Allah's given services and favours are bestowed upon him in a strategically productive way, Islam puts before him the way according to which he can utilize and consume wealth efficiently and justly. If, however, these are ignored and neglected, the specific objective outlined by Allah will be lost to man with disastrous consequences as can be seen by the widespread plight of people all over the world.
All activities, including commodities and services, are put into two categories that best suit their nature, halal (lawful) and the haram (unlawful). Wine, gambling, revelry, debauchery, wasteful entertainment...etc, are strictly prohibited because they only dissipate man's wealth.
Instead of being wasted in vain, such huge sums of money should be spent in the services of human society to satisfy fundamental human needs and preserve wealth from being squandered and lost. It is an ailment that plagued all societies who lack the sound planning Islam presents to man.
Thousands of millions of dollars are wasted daily on wine, gambling, extravagant entertainment, debauchery, as well as on accumulating weapons of mass destruction and annihilation for wars and terrorizing other nations, whilst millions of people are straddled with hunger, deprivation and misery.
Islam makes such perverse and corrupt consumption haram because its aims are to employ wealth in fields that secure welfare for humanity.
With its exact and perfectly planned economic system, Islam has placed in the hands of mankind the economic gifts of securing the cure of all financial woes and salvaging an equitable world from the abyss of poverty, deprivation and injustice in which millions still painfully suffer from and seemingly will continue to do so with ill-founded man-made equivalents.
GENERAL BASES OF DISTRIBUTION IN ISLAM
1. The distribution system of Islam is grounded in a general ideological base that "Allah is the Only Real Owner." As for man, he is not more than a deputizing vicegerent. He can only manage what he owns within certain limits, specified by Allah.
Allah, the Most High, says: "And certainly you have come to Us alone as We created you at first, and you have left behind your backs the things which We gave you, and We do not see with you your intercessors about whom you asserted that they were (Allah's) associates in respect to you; certainly the ties between you are now cut off and what you asserted is gone from you." Holy Qur'an (6:95)
"Believe in Allah and His Apostle, and spend out of what He has made to you to be successors of; for those of you who believe and spend shall have a great reward". Holy Qur'an (57:7)
2. Man has natural, instinctive needs which must be met, and under no-circumstances can he be deprived of this right. The aim of Islamic economic legislation is to provide needed commodities for man. Thus in unmistakably made clear in this Prophetic tradition.
"Allah, the Exalted and mighty, looked at the wealth of the well-off. And He looked at the destitute. He ordained a portion from the wealth of the rich to be delivered to the poor to satisfy them. If it had not satisfied them He would certainly have increased their share."[11]
The ability to earn wealth is put at man's disposal to better his life. It is not a goal in itself. Rather it is a means to manage man's economic and daily life. Wealth, therefore, has a social role. It serves man and makes him attain a nobler, and more comfortable life. In its distribution, it must be spread into every cell of the human society's body so that it can cater for all needs.
"Whatever Allah has restored to His Apostle from the people of the towns, it is for Allah and for the Apostle, and for the near of kin and the orphans and the needy and the wayfarer, so that it may not be a thing taken by turns among the rich of you, and whatever the Apostle gives you, accept it, and from whatever he forbids you, keep back, and be careful of (your duty to) Allah; surely Allah is severe in retributing (evil)". Holy Qur'an (59:7)
3. In Islam, ownership in various forms is lawful including individual, communal and state ownerships and which is an axiomatic fact in fiqh and Islamic legislation.
4. The method of gaining money, property and economic resources are restricted to certain laws as Islam puts restraints on any tendency of greediness or other unscrupulous motives including exploitation.
Islam adopts two important methods to tackle this critical point to frustrate the urges of greediness and exploitation. They are:
A - Rearing and cultivating Muslim individuals and society, both morally and spiritually, in a way that promotes virtuous aspirations to steer clear of greediness and selfishness and present the reality of wealth being only transitory aspects of a temporary life on earth. It is a life that belittles so much attention being paid to competition and making material gains merely for their own sake as man's existence has much greater goals to be achieved for his salvation.
Islam turns its attention to the process of upbringing and focuses its attention on developing the spirit of thrift, innovation and productive goals in line with its cultural values and guidance. Man is advised to overlook the fierce rat race, which in merely for grabbing more wealth and warns him not to drown himself extravagantly and excessively in lusts and corporal pleasures.
Islam calls on man, to vie with his brothers, to create good and give up a part of his property if able in favour of others in need. Man is spurred on by Islamic teachings to shun methods and amass wealth and property, which pollute the spirit, kill the conscience and dispose man to the wrath of Allah. In return, man's reward is ensured in the Hereafter. Undesirable and unproductive ways of accumulating wealth such as usury, hoarding, cheating and other unprincipled methods are forbidden by Islam.
There are bountiful texts and concepts in the Holy Our'an and the Prophetic sunnah that instead nurture a noble human spirit and promote the qualities of altruism and benevolence deep in man.
Allah, the Almighty, says in the Our'an: "And those who made their abode in the city and in the faith before them love those who have fled to them, and do not find in their hearts a need of what they are given, and prefer (them) before themselves though poverty may afflict them, and whoever is preserved from the niggardliness of his soul, these it is that are the successful ones." Holy Qur'an (59:9)
"Say: In the grace of Allah and in His mercy, in that they should rejoice; it is better than that which they gather." Holy Qur'an (10:58)
B- Laws are the second method employed by Islam to limit ways of accumulating riches and prohibit amassing through unlawful means that do the utmost harm to the community and feeds off the blood of the impoverished social class.
It is the state that takes the responsibility of achieving economic justice as it is responsible far justice in every social realm. That is why laws strictly forbid usury, hoarding, cheating and manipulating prices ...etc. The state's responsibility is to protect and enforce laws and also to prevent such unlawful practices.
The letter written by Imam Ali (a.s.) to Malik al-Ashtar, his governor in Egypt, clearly testifies to this required intervention, when saying: "Keep an eye on the activities of traders and industrialists, whether they are nearby or live in far-flung areas in your country.
"Let it be known to you, however, that they are usually stingy misers, intensely self-centered and selfish, suffering from the obsession of grasping and accumulating wealth. They often hoard their goods to make more profit out of them by creating scarcity and black markets. Such practice is extremely injurious to the public on one hand, and defames the ruler on the other.
"So put an end to hoarding up wares because the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.) has prohibited it. Remember that trade should go on between purchasers and suppliers according to correct measures and weights, and on such responsible terms that neither the consumers nor the suppliers should have to face losses. But if traders and industrialists carry on hoarding and black marketeering, even though you have explicitly warned them earlier, then you must punish them according to the intensity of their crime."
5. Economic balances by means of Islamic taxes:
Islam has laid down certain taxes like zakat (poor-rate) and khums (one-fifth of a Muslim's income paid to the treasury every year). They are taken from the well-off according to certain provisions, and delivered up to the destitute to satisfy their needs, solve the problem of poverty, and in doing so achieve economic justice. The ultimate goal of Islam here is to meet the economic needs of all Muslim individuals, so that no one is left deprived in the whole Muslim World.
Imam Ja'far bin Muhammad al-Sadiq (a.s.) is reported to have said: "Surely, Allah the Almighty and Exalted ordained a portion from the wealth of the rich to be handed out to the poor which satisfies them. Otherwise, He would certainly have increased their share. If they, however, remain unsatisfied, that is because some people deny them their undisputed right."[12]
In a dialogue between the Prophet (s.a.w.) and a man who came asking him about faith, the Prophet (s.a.w.) described zakat as a redress for the poor and a means to ensure a balance between the needy and the rich.
The man narrated that he had asked the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.) what he called for and describes the following dialogue.
"I call the servants of Allah to serve Allah," the Prophet (s.a.w.) replied.
"What do you say?," I enquired.
"Bear witness," the Prophet (s.a.w.) said, "that there is no god but Allah and that I, Muhammad, am the Messenger of Allah. You must believe in what He revealed to me, deny the deity of al- at and al-Uzzah, keep up prayer and pay zakat."
"And what is zakat?," I asked him.
"The well-off among us," he told me, "hand back the money set aside to the poor among us."[13]
Looking at the statement of the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.) in his using of the verb "hand back," the Prophet (s.a.w.) reveals the objective basis on which the process of economic distribution in Islam depends, and the secret of the balance of its concept of eeonomic justice in human society. The Prophet (s.a.w.) thus points out the effective role of Islamic taxes in addressing defeats in economic life. The reason behind that, in the light of the Prophet's statement, is that surplus wealth that ought to be distributed fairly and evenly among individuals, goes directly, due to mismanagement, to the pockets of the well-off and tips the scale at the expense of the poor. Hence, the redress is made by handing back the money to their original and lawful owners, namely the poor.
The Prophet's statement sheds a glaring light on Islam's view of one of the main pillars on which distribution is based.
It is the belief that these taxes are a lawful guarantee to protect the right that slips out of the hands of the poor, due to the self human attempts to bend the law or on the account of human failure in raising itself to the level where it can implement this natural law in economic life. These taxes underpin the ground on which the pillars of just distribution stand, in order to preserve the economy's stability, secure welfare to everyone and ensure balance is addressed on both sides of the economic scale.
6. Reciprocal social responsibility:
Reciprocal social responsibility among Muslims is a further important safeguard towards a just distribution of wealth and combatting destitution and poverty in the Muslim community.
From an Islamic education, Islamic sentiments are developed for a Muslim to feel responsible for his brother. On no account should be bask in life pleasures and luxuries whereas his brothers suffer from the severe pains bitter hunger, and unsatisfied needs.
Islamic law lays down the principle of reciprocal social responsibility on spiritual and moral grounds to implement such concerned behaviour. By so doing, Islam build up a strong, tenacious society, in which the individual shoulders his duties by identifying with his suffering brothers.
Numerous traditions and narrations emphasize this principle and urge Muslims to share the burden uniformly.
The Noble Messenger (s.a.w.) is quoted to have said: "Never does he believe in me who goes to bed full while his neighbour is hungry. Never shall Allah on the Day of Judgement look with favour at the people of a place who pass their night satisfied but among them is a hungry one."[14]
He also said: "Surely he is not a Muslim who does not take interest in the affairs of Muslims. And surely he is not a Muslim who hears a Muslim calling for help and does not respond to his call."[15]
He further said: "All of you are leaders and all of you are responsible for your subjects."
On this point Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq (a.s.) is quoted to have said: "The right of the Muslim on the Muslim is that he should never eat his fill while his brother suffers, never should be quench his thirst while his brother suffers thirst, never should he clothe himself while his brother suffers inadequate clothing."[16]
Another tradition reads: "Any believer who denies another faithful something he can certainly offer him or can do for him, on his own or with others' help, Allah shall certainly resurrect him on the Day of Judgement black-faced, with withered eyes and hands tied up to his neck. Someone shall cry out, 'This is the traitor who betrayed Allah and his Messenger.' Then he shall be ordered to be thrown into hell-fire."
Deep in themselves, Muslims feel great human sentiments. With such cooperative, kindly manners, Muslims treat one another. They only act incompatible ways with Islam's excellent teachings, which leave their mark far more than any material and corporal power could do. Muslims move to act, urged by the reward stored for them and by their implanted benevolence more than by the whip of the dictatorial authority.
7. Economic security:
In Islam, state is liable for the demands and needs of every single subject, be he Muslim or non-Muslim, should he be unable to provide for himself, through his own personal resources or his sponsor.
This point is best explained again in the letter Imam Ali (a.s.) wrote to his governor in Egypt, Malik al-Ashtar: "Then I want to caution you about the poor. Fear Allah about their condition and your attitude towards them. They have no support, no resources and no opportunities. They are poor, they are destitute and many of them are crippled and unfit for work Some of them, come out begging and some (who maintain self-respect) do not beg, but their condition screams about their distress, poverty, destitution and wants. So, protect them and their rights. Allah has laid the responsibility of this on your shoulders. You must fix a share for them from the government treasury. Beside this reservation in cash, you must also reserve a share in kind of crops...etc. from government grain stores in cities, in which such grain are collected and cultivated on state-owned lands. Because in this collection, the share of those living far away from any particular city is equal to the share of those living nearby".
Islamic law, made by this quotation, allots sums of money from the treasury to support the infirm and needy, who can no longer work or that their incomes fall short of covering their expenses. It states clearly the principle the state's responsibility for economic security that applies to every citizen, irrespective of his/her religion.
It is narrated that one day Imam Ali (a.s.) saw a Christian dimmi (non-Muslim citizen living in an Islamic state) begging. Amir al-Mu'minin (a.s.) asked:
"Who is this?"
"Oh Amir al-Mu'minin!," said people, who were present.
"He is a Christian."
"You employed him," Amir al-Mu'minin (a.s.) retorted, "until he become old and infirm then you denied him help. Spend on him from the treasury."[17]
8. Lawful sources of wealth:
Sources of ownership, or the means by which man can gain wealth, property and amenities of life, are looked upon by Islam as important matters, which define the identity of the economic system, its method of distributing wealth among members of society, fighting poverty and need, and rooting out greed, exploitation and unlawful ways of gaining wealth.
Islam sets two key ways of gaining wealth which are work and need. They are lawfully accepted ways of ownership.[18]
A- Employment and natural resources:
One may work in agriculture, mining, industry or any field of production or one may give one's services in the fields of medicine, engineering, transportation, education, trade...etc. In Islam, employment in any field of lawful activity, is the chief way of acquiring wealth and money. Islam lays out great emphasis on the personal role in securing wealth and obtaining money, as we have previously detailed.
B- Need:
In the same way Islam made work a legal way of getting money and wealth, it made need a source of ownership for wealth to fight destitution and poverty. But ownership here is different from the former one.
For ownership, in the first case, is the fruit of the direct interaction between man, nature or raw materials, or services rendered to satisfy some needs. Man here becomes entitled to ownership in return for the fruits of his labour.
As for ownership by need, it is the process of conveying property or wealth from one owner to another one on account of the need for it by the new owner. In order of precedence, the latter kind of ownership comes second to the first one. Ownership by need is placed in the category of owning something by inheritance and maintenance as in the case given by the husband to his wife.
The needy, who cannot work, due to bodily infirmity or can finds no work, has a share in the money set aside from the taxes of zakat and khums, or from the money allotted by the state to meet the needs of the impoverished.
The ultimate result of this economic system being put into practice is that every single member of the Islamic community becomes economically secure. He neither fears poverty nor does he worry about his daily life. On the contrary he feels secure, and has confidence in the community and state he lives under its shade.
Once this unmatched economic system is implemented, and security in welfare prevails along side with stability. All man's efforts then are channelled into one conduit, which is the competition to do good and to work for building and constructing a society far removed from in fighting and aggressive and destructive erosions.
Praise be to Allah, Lord of the world.
FOOTNOTES:
1. Al-Kulaini, al-Kafi, vol. 5, p. 71,
2. Al-Kulaini, op. cit.
3. Al-Kulaini, op. cit.
4. Al-Kulaini, op. cit.
5. Al-Kulaini, op. cit.
6. Al-Kulaini, op. cit. p. 72.
7. Theory of the social system is the first stage of the ideological ladder. It is the bases from which laws and legislations are derived. Social and moral theory is the foundation stone on which man depends to outline the attitude towards different matters in these two fields. Laws then come to incarnate the theory and give it a practical quality in the lives of the individual and the community (like the areas of obligation, prohibition, permission, unlawfulness and lawfulness).
8. Al-Naraqi, Jami' al- Sa'adat (Collector of Felicities), vol. 2, p. 46.
9. Al-Harani, Tuhaf al-Uqul an Aal al-Rasul, Mawa'id al-Nabi (Treasures of Minds about the Household of the Messenger of Allah, Exhortations of the Prophet).
10. Al-Kulaini, al-Kafi, vol. 5, p.67.
11. Al-Tabari, Mirza Hussein al-Nuri, Mustadrak al-Wasa'il, chapter on zakat.
12. Al-Kulaini, al-Kafi, vol. 3, 3rd ed., p. 497
13. Sa'id Hawa, al-Rasul (The Messenger), vol. 1, pp. 121123.
14. Al-Kulaini, al-Kafi, 3rd ed., p. 668.
15. Ibid, p. 164.
16. Al-Kulaini, al-Usul min al-Kafi, vol. 2, p. 170.
17. Al-Hur al-Amili, Wasa'il al-Shi'ah, vol. 6, 2nd ed., p. 49.
18. There are other ways of ownership in Islam allied to work and need, including inheritance, maintenance, donation, gifts, profits of endowments...etc, which our main focus has not separated out.
Imam reza network
They Insist That Business is Like Ar-Riba
In the Name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful
"And Allah has permitted business (bai'a) and prohibited Ar-Riba,"
The Qur'an says in continuation of the captioned quote from verse Q: 2.275.
The subject caption above is a quote from the Qur'aan - part of 275th verse in Chapter 2 thereof [Q: 2.275].
I do not have before me now any historical evidence of people living at the time of revelation of the Qur'aan saying so, but I know of people in my own age - some of the religious leaders of my own Faith- saying so. They say that the banking business is Ar-Riba. In fact, they have gone even beyond the Qur'anic quote. They do not say that this business is like Ar-Riba. They say it is Ar-Riba.
By business, of course, what they mean here is the earnings that it generates. Since a bank invests a substantial portion of the money it holds in debt instruments - in giving loans for trade and industry etc. - the interest accrued on such loans constitutes a major source of its earnings.
Most of the money that a bank gets as interest goes in meeting bona fide expenses like salaries to staff, office rentals and equipment, interests paid to depositors etc. The rest of it is the net earning of the bank. The open market forces oblige the bank to keep its net earning/profit margin as low as possible.
Banking Is a Legitimate Business
Banking is thus a legitimate business as any other. Whereas other businesses provide materials and services conveniently to their customers, banking business provides purchasing power (money). Banking business thus fulfils a legitimate necessity in human society.
The religious leaders deride this legitimate business as unlawful because part of its profit comes from interest. And, in their view, Ar-Riba that the Qur'aan prohibits, is interest, and nothing but interest.
There is no Qur'aanic basis for this interpretation of the religious leaders. The Arabic word Riba literally means increase/gain/growth. So all kinds of increases ought to be covered by this general term.
I can effect an increase in my wealth by evading Government taxes. I can effect the increase by paying my employees less than what they actually deserve to get. I can effect the increase by shirking the work given to me by my employer and attending to my own private work during the employer's office hours. I can effect the increase by unduly hiking my profit margins on the goods I sell, by economic exploitation of my hapless customers.
There are umpteen numbers of other dubious ways in which I can effect increases in my wealth. But the religious leaders insist that the increase, effected by taking interest only, is prohibited as Ar-Riba. And they give no Qur'aanic basis for this interpretation.
A careful study of the very first verse [Q: 30.39], as also the subsequent ones, revealed in the matter of Ar-Riba, would show otherwise. It would show that the increases effected by the dubious means such as the ones mentioned in the paragraph preceding the last one above, rather than interest as such, that are all covered in the Qur'anic Concept of Ar-Riba.
Allah Has Permitted Business
When one effects an increase in one's wealth by adopting any of these dubious means, one perpetrates an injustice on someone else. Allah condemns and abhors every kind of injustice. By prohibiting Ar-Riba, He has prohibited all economic injustices.
"And Allah has permitted business (bai'a) and prohibited Ar-Riba," the Qur'aan says in continuation of the captioned quote from verse Q: 2.275.
Despite the divine permission thus given to business, the religious leaders insist that the interest-based banking business is a prohibited one. Look what the Qur'an says in this context:
"Those who devour Ar-Riba stand not but as one on whom has the Satan cast his spell by touch. That is because they insist that the business is like Ar-Riba!"Â
This, in fact, is the beginning part, which includes the captioned quote, of the same said verse Q: 2.275.
Indeed! Persons influenced by Satan only could call a divinely permitted thing prohibited. Under this satanic influence, we, Muslims substitute the divine concept of Ar-Riba with its man-made interpretation as interest and nothing but interest. The Satan must be congratulating himself immensely! For, by this masterstroke, he is not only impoverishing the Muslims, his arch-enemies, economically, but has also succeeded in keeping them blissfully unaware of the real Ar-Riba growing - and growing luxuriantly - in their own backyards.
Yes Brothers and Sisters, the unpalatable and bitter truth is that we Muslims are ourselves steeply involved in Ar-Riba dealings - more so than the people living in some of the well-developed countries are. Because, Ar-Riba is corruption. It is, in the Qur'anic concept, the unjust usurpation of others' dues in transactional dealings. It is economic injustice. A sincere and diligent study of the Qur'aanic verses on Ar-Riba, I am sure, will reveal this fact to you.
Study the relevant verses, therefore, please and save yourself from Hell fire! For, the said verse, Q: 2.275, ends as follows,Â
"And the ones who persist (in Ar-Riba dealings) shall be those who would inhabit the Fire, therein to abide!"
Mohammad Shafi J. Aga
Author of The Qur'aanic Concept Of Ar-Riba
Ref: Almujtaba
The Islamic Economic System and Europe
By: Dr. Jan Sammuelsson (Sweden)
A few reflections regarding Iqtisaduna by Ayatullah Sayyid Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr
Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr's work Iqtisaduna ("Our Economics") is constituted by a comparison between different economic systems, namely capitalism, Marxism and Islamic economy in the light of the author's conception of these systems.
Sadr's point of departure in his work can be regarded as ideological, however it is beyond question a scholarly method with footnotes, with a usual account of sources and the text enables the reader to follow the author from his reasoning to the conclusions he draws.
The point of departure that Sadr presents above all is the fact that there is no other framework within which to find solutions to the problems of backwardness in Muslim countries with the exception of the framework of the Islamic economic system. Further reasoning regarding this standpoint constitutes a dominant feature of Iqtisaduna.
Another important element is the reasoning about what the Islamic economic system implies and its position in proportion to economic systems like capitalism and Marxism. Sadr establishes the fact that it is not possible to choose the same methods used by Europeans in the building-up of their modern economy. The Islamic world has tried two economic systems developed by Europeans: market economy based on the capitalistic ideology, and planned economy based on the socialistic ideology. The results weren't encouraging. (The author uses the notion Marxism and socialism alternatively. The distinction between these two notions isn't always clear and, in several cases, they can be understood as synonymous notions). The author points out that it is not possible to just withdraw an economic system from its historical and social context and apply it in a society with totally different conditions. He emphasizes the fact that there are close links between, on the one hand Marxism and capitalism, and on the other hand European traditions and social conditions. These economic systems cannot be applied in societies based on religion. Not even if religion was suddenly abolished in an Islamic society would that be possible since ethics, traditions and institutions were formed by a centuries old Islamic influence.
It is easy to agree with Sadr's opinion about Marxism in that it is an ideology applicable in European conditions in the first place. This becomes obvious when one studies Marxian analyses that were for example carried out by Soviet researchers. It concerns awkward attempts to find "the Asian way of production" in Muslim societies. In view of that, Islam is often presented in deprecating wordings in these studies. (Brattlud, Asa - Samuelsson, Jan: Islam English folkrorelse. Muslimer i Svenskt Samhallsliv. Skelleftea 1991. Page 19).
Sadr presents political and psychological aspects that go against the application of Marxism and capitalism in Muslim societies. The Ummah must base its modern revival on a social organization and culture whose origin is not related to the countries of the colonialists. Why? Well because there is a psychological dislike to methods, ideas and institutions that are directly associated with Europe. This in itself worsens the possibility of applying these methods successfully.
Sadr describes Europe as a unit. Likewise, non-Muslim writers perceive the Muslim world as a unit. Generalizations like "Islam" and "Europe" are of course uncertain in certain contexts. However they can be regarded as being conventional within the frames of scientific literature that concerns these fields. See for instance Bernard Lewis: Islam and the West, New York 1993, as well as other works by Lewis.
When Sadr tries to capture what denotes a typical European human being, he becomes more ideological than scientific. "Europeans always look at the earth, not at heaven". Pious Catholics in Spain for example or Italy would certainly lift their eyebrows before such a description. The author also means that Europeans are freedom-lovers, both in a positive and a negative sense, in that they strive after freedom from moral responsibility. The European has also a tendency of perceiving existence as a struggle situation. This has been expressed in European science and philosophy through Darwinism, the class struggle of Marxism and the struggle between contrasts in the Hegelian viewpoint. But for someone who perceives the presence of God in the creation, that is to say Muslims, the perspective is different. The interest for material advantages is not so dominant. According to Sadr, the interest for individual and moral freedom also gets impaired. Sadr wants to show here that Muslims and Europeans are generally constituted by two different types of human beings without further explaining why so is the case. The reasoning constitutes a link in the author's argumentation that the European way of thinking cannot successfully be applied in Islamic conditions.
A few conclusions can be drawn from Sadr's apprehensions. First of all, it follows from the author's reasoning that the Islamic economic system can barely work in Europe for the same reasons that economic systems like Marxism and capitalism cannot completely work in Islamic conditions. Another question is, in my opinion, whether individual Islamic economic institutions, like the Islamic bank, can work in a non-Islamic context like Europe. One can object to this question by claiming it is not correctly formulated. Europe can simply not be considered as a non-Islamic context. Nowadays, Europe embraces several considerable Islamic minorities even though their influence on the political process is humble. As a matter of fact millions of Muslims live in Europe. More than 300,000 Muslims live in Sweden alone which counts a relatively small population (Samuelsson, Jan: Islam i Sverige, Stockholm, 1999). These Islamic population groups in Europe should be considered as a sufficient basis to establish more Islamic banks in Europe. The question can be asked in a different way. An economic institution like an Islamic bank attract non-Muslims and in addition to that work in a satisfactory way even for non-Islamic customer? If this is the case, one cannot by reason exclude the opposite, at least in principle, namely that individual institutions within the capitalistic or Marxian economic system could work in an Islamic context.
Some debaters within the field of Islamic economy have vindicated that an Islamic bank cannot work well in a non-Islamic economy. In issues in Islamic banking, Leicester 1983, M. N. Siddiqi vindicated that the Islamic bank could only be successful in countries where the interest institution was forbidden and where interest proceedings were a penal action. However, this doesn't seem to be the most common opinion. Most Islamic economists and persons conversant with the legal system in Islam think that it is both possible and recommendable to act even in countries where Islam has little influence. It is also considered that Islamic banks can successfully compete against institutions based on interest and even attract customers who are not Muslims. For instance, the management of A Baraka Turkish Finance House in Istanbul stands for such an opinion. Al Baraka's management think it is possible thanks to the high profitability produced by the bank and because of the fact that even non-Muslims can be attracted by the link between ethics and economy that the bank stands for. (Samuelsson, Jan: Islamisk Ekonomi, Lund 1999, p. 67).
Another observation from Sadr's reasoning is whether other reasons than those mentioned can be at the bottom of his dissociation from Marxism and capitalism as European systems. Such a theological, and perhaps also psychological reason with elements from a magical thinking, is what I would like to call "the conception of the European contagion".
Bernard Lewis points out that the Islamic habit, historically provable in several cases, to define innovation (bidah) as deviation from tradition. Tradition is regarded as being good and as containing God's message to mankind. Therefore, deviating from tradition is a priori something negative.
A particularly repudiable variation of bidah is when one imitates the unfaithful person's habits. A tradition attributed to Prophet Muhammad(S.A.W.) says that "whoever imitates people becomes one of them". It has sometimes been interpreted as follows: whoever enters the unfaithful person's habits and behaviors commits a heretical action and an action of treason towards Islam, in other words one becomes unfaithful himself. (Lewis, Bernard: The Muslim Discovery of Europe, London 1982, p. 224).
This interpretation was done frequently by persons conversant with the Qur'an in the Ottoman Empire in order to stop certain phenomena like scientific innovations, as for instance the apparition of printing technique and new medicines that originated from Europe. The perception that everything that was European was a priori evil, with a few exceptions like weapon technique, contributed undoubtedly to the destruction of the Ottoman Empire. Are we confronted to another case of the European contagion syndrome in Sadr's work Iqtisaduna?
I have to answer no. Sadr's arguments sustaining the difficulty of applying Marxism and capitalism are based on logical reasoning that is well presented. For the Muslim reader, it is however important, in my opinion, not to generalize in the light of Sadr's opinion concerning economic systems and come to the conclusion that anything of European origin is in principle useless in an Islamic context. However, such a conclusion is very probable with regard to the founded distrust that exists towards the western world within considerable Muslim population groups. Crusades and colonialism, together with not the least aggressive American interventions in the Muslim world in modern times, has prepared Muslims to behold what the western world stands for with skepticism.
Political vigilance towards the West is one thing. From an Islamic perspective, it is well founded and essential. If this skepticism influenced the will to acquire special knowledge from West within the scientific fields, the price would be high from an economic point of view.
For economic and political reasons various writers have often taken pains to find similarities or differences (from separate motives, often of a political nature) between the Islamic economic system and certain other economic systems.
Comparisons have been made with systems based on market economy and planned economy. Political leaders, like the former president Nasser in Egypt, have tried to point out certain similarities between socialism/communism and Islam while the leadership in Saudi Arabia has tried to point out the differences between these systems. The destruction of the Soviet Empire has made certain leaders in the Islamic world less prone to emphasize similarities between socialism and Islam. If there is any tendency today, in the Islamic world, regarding comparisons between Islamic economy and other economic systems, it is in my opinion that the Islamic economy tends to be described, either as a unique system independent from capitalism and socialism, or as the golden mean between the two extremes/poles capitalism and socialism.
How does Sadr describe the Islamic economic system in Iqtisaduna
Although Sadr obviously perceives the Islamic economic system as a unique system, the argumentation itself often tends to follow the fact that this system constitutes what one can call the golden mean. Communism and capitalism are perceived as two antipodes with Islam between them. Islam gets characterized as the rational mean between two irrational extremes. Here are a few examples: When it comes to ownership, the pole socialism stands for collective owning only while the pole capitalism stands for private ownership. As the rational mean, Islam stands for both collective and private ownership. When it comes to economic freedom, the pole socialism stands for no economic freedom while capitalism stands for total economic freedom. According to Sadr, Islam here stands for economic freedom but with limitations. "Islam took a middle stand, banning some kinds of profit like the usurious and permitting some others like the commercial profit." (Sadr: Our Economics, volume one, part two, page 129).
Moderation, balance, adequate are notions that have been applied and experienced as ideals in several Islamic contexts. This is quite obvious in the Islamic medical history. The good life leading to physical and spiritual health is characterized by adequate sleep, adequate food, adequate sexuality, adequate work and adequate prayers. Take for example Prophet Muhammad's attitude against exaggerated praying at the expense of social life. In his description of the Islamic economic system, Sadr can be seen as referring to this traditional adequate/moderation/balance - notion.
The author thinks that the Islamic economy is distinguished by social balance. With its way of thinking turned towards partnership, the Islamic bank confirms the conception that groups within the Islamic society aren't in opposition to one another as are for instance loan takers and loan givers or employees and employers in European societies.
Sadr's perception of Islamic economy can be compared to what Muhammad Umar Chapra has expressed. He thinks that what capitalism and socialism lacks, and Islam offers, is the synopsis between spiritual and material values - the capitalistic and socialistic systems have neglected people's spiritual needs. Every attempt to point out similarities between these systems and Islam shows the lack of understanding for what capitalism and socialism are, namely materialistic systems, Chapra says and, with that, describes Islam more as a unique system rather than a mean (Chapra, M.U.: Objectives of the Islamic Economic Order. Leicester, 1996, pp. 21-27).
In the article Zakat and Social Justice, M.A.Z. Badawi claims that Islam constitutes the right point of balance between the two extremes, capitalism and socialism. He seems thereby to perceive Islam more as the mean (Badawi: Zakat and Social Justice, in The Muslim World and the Future Economic Order. London: 1979).
Muslim writers usually claim that Islamic economy can be seen both as a unique system and the golden mean between capitalism and socialism although one of these two standpoints is emphasized more than the other.
It is, from a logical philosophical point of view important to emphasize the fact that there is a big difference between these two ways of describing Islamic economy. The standpoint that the Islamic economy is a totally unique system implies that the difference between Islamic economy and the capitalistic and socialistic system is basically of a qualitative nature. The standpoint that the Islamic economy constitutes the golden mean implies that the differences in comparison to socialism and capitalism are in the first place quantitative (more collective ownership - less collective ownership, more individual freedom less individual freedom, etc.).
Muslim writers usually claim that Islamic economy can be seen both as a unique system and the golden mean between capitalism and socialism although one of these two standpoints is emphasized more than the other.
It is, from a logical philosophical point of view to emphasize the fact that there is a big difference between these two ways of describing Islamic economy. The standpoint that the Islamic economy is a totally unique system implies that the differences between Islamic economy and the capitalistic and socialistic system are basically of a qualitative nature. The standpoint that the Islamic economy constitutes the golden mean implies that the differences in comparison to socialism and capitalism are in the first place quantitative (more collective ownership - less collective ownership, more individual freedom - less individual freedom, etc.).
According to Sadr, Islam denies the fact that the form of production in a society forms this society's social organization in a decisive way. It is still possible to retain a certain social system even though the form of production changes with time. Sadr asserts here the principle that there is no demanding connection between a social system and a form production. The fundamental postulate of the materialistic historical perception, concerning the significance of the forms of production is brilliantly rejected by Sadr by means of the best conceivable example: The origin of the Islamic civilization. It wasn't the result of a new form of production or of important changes in the prevailing form of production. The most recent revolutionary experiment constituted by Islam can hardly be explained in the light of the socialistic perception of history, the author claims and it is hard not to agree with that. According to Marxism, the idea that men are equal and have fundamental rights is developed with the growing bourgeoisie in Europe and is encouraged by the industrial revolution. However, similar ideas existed in the Arabian Peninsula in Makkah more than 1,000 years before the bourgeoisie revolution in Europe. What was there in this society living on agriculture and commerce (commerce being limited compared to other Arabic societies during the same period), leading to the perception of human equality? To Sadr, the answer is the one of the believer. In my opinion, non-Muslims haven't yet received any satisfactory answer regarding this question.
The politics of equalizing economic conditions among members of the Islamic society (first of all with the help of zakat) that arose in Islam during the 7th century cannot be described as a result of the fairly unsophisticated economic activity that took place in this region during that period. The fact that the trade - development in Makkah required a more organized society cannot explain the origin of the Islamic civilization, a phenomenon that changed the history of the world. Makkah's situation between Yemen and Syria was not unique. The city of Petra had a much more flourishing economy. Another flourishing city with as good of chances as Makkah was Palmyra. Even other cities can be named in this context. "No," Sadr sums up in his reasoning; the Islamic revolution wasn't the result of certain material conditions and commercial circumstances in the region of Makkah.
It is obvious that Sadr approaches the question at issue, with his arguments, in a scientific way. Yet, the reasoning is also ideologically attractive from an Islamic perspective since it leads to the opinion that Islam could be maintained as a social form/system irrespective of the social form of production.
The conclusion is extensive:
Islam can survive or be introduced irrespective of the material conditions existing in a society.
Bibliography:
Al-Sadr, Muhammad Baqir, Iqtisaduna (Our Economics), English translation from the Arabic, Volume One and Two, Tehran: 1994.
Brattlund, Asa - Samuelsson, Jan, Islam - English folkrorelse, Muslimer i Svenskt Samhallsiv, Skelleftea: 1991. (In Swedish).
Badawi, M.A.Z., Zakat and Social Justice, "The Muslim World and the Future Economic Order", London: 1979.
Chapra, Muhammad Umar, Objectives of the Islamic Economic Order, Leicester: 1996.
Lewis, Bernard, Islam and the West, New York: 1993. Lewis, Bernard, The Muslim Discovery of Europe, London: 1982.
Samuelsson, Jan, Islam i Sverige, Stockholm: 1999. (In Swedish).
Samuelsson, Jan, Islamisk Ekonomi, Lund: 2000. (In Swedish).
Siddiqi, M. Nejatullah, Issues in Islamic Banking, Leicester:
1983.
Ref: Imam Reza Network
کمک و هدایای مالی به سایت جهت پیشرفت:
6037998157379727 (بانک ملی بنام سیدمحمدموسوی )
روابط عمومی گروه : 09174009011
شماره نوبت استخاره: 09102506002
آیدی همه پیام رسانها : @shiaquest
پاسخگویی سوالات شرعی: 09102506002
آدرس : استان قم شهر قم گروه پژوهشی تبارک
پست الکترونیک : [email protected]
درباره گروه تبارک
گروه تحقیقی تبارک با درک اهميت اطلاع رسـاني در فضاي وب در سال 88 اقدام به راه اندازي www.shiaquest.net نموده است. اين پايگاه با داشتن بخش های مختلف هزاران مطلب و مقاله ی علمي را در خود جاي داده که به لحاظ کمي و کيفي يکي از برترين پايگاه ها و دارا بودن بهترین مطالب محسوب مي گردد. ارائه محتوای کاربردی تبلیغ برای طلاب و مبلغان ،ارائه مقالات متنوع کاربردی پاسخگویی به سئوالات و شبهات کاربران ,دین شناسی، جهان شناسی ،معاد شناسی، مهدویت و امام شناسی و دیگر مباحث اعتقادی ،آشنایی با فرق و ادیان و فرقه های نو ظهور، آشنایی با احکام در موضوعات مختلف و خانواده و... از بخشهای مختلف این سایت است. اطلاعات موجود در این سایت بر اساس نياز جامعه و مخاطبين توسط محققين از منابع موثق تهيه و در اختيار كاربران قرار مى گيرد.